2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4694567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Framework Based on Deep Learning and ANOVA Feature Selection Method for Diagnosis of COVID-19 Cases from Chest X-Ray Images

Abstract: Background and Objective. The new coronavirus disease (known as COVID-19) was first identified in Wuhan and quickly spread worldwide, wreaking havoc on the economy and people’s everyday lives. As the number of COVID-19 cases is rapidly increasing, a reliable detection technique is needed to identify affected individuals and care for them in the early stages of COVID-19 and reduce the virus’s transmission. The most accessible method for COVID-19 identification is Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, measuring one factor, such as precision, is not enough to evaluate the suggested model; hence, we determined the other two factors, recall and F1-score, as listed in Table 2. The results of our methodology are considered improved when compared to the work of Nasiri and Alavi (2022), since they used DenseNet169 that had already been pretrained and consisted of layers, while our network is more compact. However, Nasiri and Alavi (2022) achieved an accuracy of 98.72%, whereas multi-class classification using COVID-19, no findings and pneumonia achieved 92.8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, measuring one factor, such as precision, is not enough to evaluate the suggested model; hence, we determined the other two factors, recall and F1-score, as listed in Table 2. The results of our methodology are considered improved when compared to the work of Nasiri and Alavi (2022), since they used DenseNet169 that had already been pretrained and consisted of layers, while our network is more compact. However, Nasiri and Alavi (2022) achieved an accuracy of 98.72%, whereas multi-class classification using COVID-19, no findings and pneumonia achieved 92.8%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), proposed by Chen and Guestrin 49 , is an efficient and scalable ensemble algorithm based on gradient boosted trees 16 , 50 . XGBoost has been used in a wide range of engineering fields, resulting in outstanding performance due to the advantages of parallel tree boosting and using various regularization techniques 13 , 51 , 52 . XGBoost is a stable algorithm with low bias and variance, handling outliers 24 , 53 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANOVA method is a popular statistical approach for comparing several independent means. In this method, the features are scored based on the ratio of the between-group variance to the within-group variance through the F-test [33]. The statistical ratio of the F-test is given in (3).…”
Section: Anova Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TN TP FN FP (7) F1-Score: Mathematically speaking, it is the result of dividing the doubled precision and sensitivity by their sum as shown in (8) [33]. Tables III and Table IV represent the comparison of the proposed method with other methods in two-class and multiclass problems, respectively.…”
Section: Tn Tp Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%