“…Using the training and validation datasets, we first identified 6 preserved PCa-driven modules and then screened 9 prognosis-related genes (including 3 lncRNAs: DLG5-AS1, MAGI2-AS3, and RHPN1-AS1; and 6 mRNAs: GINS2, NLGN2, EBNA1BP2, MELK, EIF5AL1, and G6PC3) from these modules to construct the risk score. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated the prediction accuracy of this molecular risk score was higher than that of clinical indicators (the Gleason score [AUC = 0.945 vs.0.57], PSA [AUC = 0.945 vs.0.578], and combined [AUC = 0.945 vs.0.673]), which was in line with the studies of Li et al [ 9 ], Shi et al [ 10 ], Huang et al [ 11 ], and Xu et al [ 12 ]. More importantly, our integrated model seemed to be more effective than the single mRNA model (Xu et al: 4-mRNA, AUC = 0.945 vs.0.904 [ 26 ]) for OS prediction, which was also observed in our study (AUC = 0.945 vs.0.81) ( Figure 7 ).…”