2023
DOI: 10.2174/1386207325666220520105634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Glycolysis-Related Gene Signature Predicts Prognosis For Cutaneous Melanoma

Abstract: Background: There exists a lack of effective tools predicting prognosis for cutaneous melanoma patients. Glycolysis plays an essential role in the carcinogenesis process. Objective: : We intended to construct a new prognosis model for cutaneous melanoma. Method: Based on the data from TCGA database, we conducted univariate Cox regression analysis and identified prognostic glycolysis-related genes (GRGs). Meanwhile, GSE15605 dataset was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The intersectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicting the accurate prognosis of melanoma patients is essential for clinical practice. Earlier prognostic models for melanoma patients were developed based on hypoxia score [ 13 ], ferroptosis-related gene [ 14 ], immune-related gene [ 15 ], glycolysis-related gene [ 16 ], and pyroptosis-related lncRNA [ 17 ]. It is not appropriate to make definitive comparisons among these studies since different data sources were used to evaluate the prognostic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predicting the accurate prognosis of melanoma patients is essential for clinical practice. Earlier prognostic models for melanoma patients were developed based on hypoxia score [ 13 ], ferroptosis-related gene [ 14 ], immune-related gene [ 15 ], glycolysis-related gene [ 16 ], and pyroptosis-related lncRNA [ 17 ]. It is not appropriate to make definitive comparisons among these studies since different data sources were used to evaluate the prognostic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prognostic prediction models for melanoma have been constructed based on hypoxia score [ 13 ], ferroptosis-related gene [ 14 ], immune-related gene [ 15 ], glycolysis-related gene [ 16 ], and pyroptosis-related lncRNA [ 17 ]. However, the prediction ability of these prognostic models needs further evaluation due to poor predictive performance in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.628) [ 13 ], the absence of time-dependent receiver operative characteristic (ROC) analysis [ 14 , 15 ], or the lack of a validation cohort [ 16 , 17 ]. To the best of our knowledge, there was no prediction model based on BRAF mutation status in melanoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%