2019
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2018.1559918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel high-volume Photochemical Emission Aging flow tube Reactor (PEAR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the experimental challenges is to achieve extended aging time periods because the average atmospheric lifetime of soot particles is approximately 1 week (Textor et al, 2006). A common approach is the application of (photo-)oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) like the Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM) chamber (Kang et al, 2007), the Toronto Photo-Oxidation Tube (TPOT; George et al, 2007), the Micro Smog Chamber (MSC; Keller and Burtscher, 2012), the TUT Secondary Aerosol Reactor (TSAR; Simonen et al, 2017) or the Photochemical Emission Aging flow tube Reactor (PEAR; Ihalainen et al, 2019). Within these devices, the residence time ranges from 3 to 170 s and the OH-radical concentration ranges from 4.9 × 10 8 to 130 × 10 8 molec cm −3 , while the average atmospheric OH-radical concentration is orders of magnitude lower with 1.5 × 10 6 molec cm −3 (Mao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the experimental challenges is to achieve extended aging time periods because the average atmospheric lifetime of soot particles is approximately 1 week (Textor et al, 2006). A common approach is the application of (photo-)oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) like the Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM) chamber (Kang et al, 2007), the Toronto Photo-Oxidation Tube (TPOT; George et al, 2007), the Micro Smog Chamber (MSC; Keller and Burtscher, 2012), the TUT Secondary Aerosol Reactor (TSAR; Simonen et al, 2017) or the Photochemical Emission Aging flow tube Reactor (PEAR; Ihalainen et al, 2019). Within these devices, the residence time ranges from 3 to 170 s and the OH-radical concentration ranges from 4.9 × 10 8 to 130 × 10 8 molec cm −3 , while the average atmospheric OH-radical concentration is orders of magnitude lower with 1.5 × 10 6 molec cm −3 (Mao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the experimental challenges is achieving extended ageing time periods since the average atmospheric lifetime of soot particles is approximately one week (Textor et al, 2006). A common approach is the application of (photo-)Oxidation Flow Reactors (OFR) like the Potential Aerosol Mass (PAM) chamber (Kang et al, 2007), Toronto Photo-Oxidation Tube (TPOT; George et al, 2007), Micro Smog Chamber (MSC;Keller and Burtscher, 2012), the TUT Secondary Aerosol Reactor (TSAR; Simonen et al, 2017) or the Photochemical Emission Aging flow tube Reactor 35 (PEAR; Ihalainen et al, 2019). Within these devices, the residence time ranges from 3 to 170 s and the OH-radical concentration ranges from 4.9 × 10 8 to 130 × 10 8 molec•cm -3 , while the average atmospheric OH-radical concentration is orders of magnitude less with 1.5 × 10 6 molec•cm -3 (Mao et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we test the t act concept on real experimental data and finally apply it to other types of continuous-flow aging chambers such as OFRs. We show that application of the t act concept is capable of giving new insights into OFR data and further significantly improves the understanding of discrepancies in experimental results obtained in intercomparison studies (Lambe et al, 2011) with different reactors, such as the potential aerosol mass chamber (PAM; Kang et al, 2007) and the Toronto Photo-Oxidation Tube (TPOT; George et al, 2007).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The ideal OFR would be an ideal plug flow reactor (PFR) with the RTD being a Dirac delta function, often referred to as an impulse function. However, all OFRs have an RTD that lies between an ideal CSTR and an ideal PFR and is further dependent on the individual design of the OFR (George et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2017;Ihalainen et al, 2019;Kang et al, 2007;Simonen et al, 2017). Lambe et al (2011) already suggested that the RTD reduces the comparability of results from different OFR types.…”
Section: Application Of T Act To Other Continuous-flow Aerosol Chambersmentioning
confidence: 99%