2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29029-0_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Hybrid Recommendation System Integrating Content-Based and Rating Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we have three main contributions. Firstly, when investigating the genome scores information used in our previous article [44], we found that the total number of tags can be reduced by combining similar tags together while still getting competitive results. Secondly, we could even compress this information further by a method in deep learning called autoencoder to automatically learn the hidden representation of the genome scores.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we have three main contributions. Firstly, when investigating the genome scores information used in our previous article [44], we found that the total number of tags can be reduced by combining similar tags together while still getting competitive results. Secondly, we could even compress this information further by a method in deep learning called autoencoder to automatically learn the hidden representation of the genome scores.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [44], we noticed that similarity measures using the rating information faces some problems. Firstly, in practice the rating matrix is highly sparse (for example, 99.47% of the ratings in the MovieLens 20M dataset are missing); therefore, evaluating the relevance between two movies that have many ratings but share only few common users using above similarity measures is not reliable.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [38], a number of problems regarding similarity measurement method using the rating information were noticed. Firstly, the rating matrix in practice is extremely sparse (for example, 99.47% entries of this matrix in the MovieLens 20 M dataset are missing), which makes it hard to evaluate the relevance between two items that have many ratings but only share a few common users.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• NMF: optimization procedure is a regularized SGD based on Euclidean distance error function [41] with regularization strength of 0.02 and 40 hidden factors. • kNN-Content [38]: PCC genome is used as the similarity measure. • kNN-Content AE -SVD and kNN-Content AE -SVD++ [39]: 600-feature vectors for movies are learned from 1044 NLP-preprocessed genome tags using a 3-layer AE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%