2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel Lagrange-multiplier based method for consistent mesh tying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mixed Galerkin methods for mesh tying that are consistent when applied to geometries with curved interfaces may significantly increase the complexity of the overall solution [17], and lead to indefinite linear systems [1][2][3]15,19]. We formulated and analyzed an LSFEM for mesh tying that is optimally accurate, patch test consistent for arbitrary order discretizations, and gives rise to sparse symmetric positive definite matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mixed Galerkin methods for mesh tying that are consistent when applied to geometries with curved interfaces may significantly increase the complexity of the overall solution [17], and lead to indefinite linear systems [1][2][3]15,19]. We formulated and analyzed an LSFEM for mesh tying that is optimally accurate, patch test consistent for arbitrary order discretizations, and gives rise to sparse symmetric positive definite matrices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage of these methods is that in order to maintain accuracy, typically six levels of uniform 3D mesh refinement are required near the boundary to pass the patch test approximately. The generalized Lagrange multiplier method of [19] avoids the mesh refinement but requires an interface balancing procedure to cancel out the signed areas of the gaps and overlaps.…”
Section: Specifics Of Mesh Tyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Тогда в глобальной системе уравнений появятся дополнительные степени свободы, связанные с аппроксимацией этого множителя. Варианты использования такого подхода можно найти в работах [3,14]. С другой стороны, два последних равенства из (2.10) определяют множитель b через уже введенные переменные и можно априори положить .…”
Section: вариационный принципunclassified
“…The reader is referred to, for example, and references therein for a comprehensive overview in the context of fluid–structure interaction (FSI). However, only mortar finite element methods (FEMs) as addressed, for example, in and other closely related Lagrange multiplier methods as discussed, for example, in assure mathematical optimality of the interface coupling in the sense that the global discretization error is bounded by the sum of the individual subdomain errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%