2015
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2015.2421288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel <italic>In Situ</italic> Efficiency Estimation Algorithm for Three-Phase IM Using GA, IEEE Method F1 Calculations, and Pretested Motor Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to adapt this PLL to our application, we propose to modify the original structure by producing a normalized signals with amplitude ±1, regardless of the sensor used and its position. The normalization is possible if the signals v α and v β have the same amplitude, which is not the case with the filters (18). The same output amplitude is obtained by:…”
Section: Pll Principle and Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to adapt this PLL to our application, we propose to modify the original structure by producing a normalized signals with amplitude ±1, regardless of the sensor used and its position. The normalization is possible if the signals v α and v β have the same amplitude, which is not the case with the filters (18). The same output amplitude is obtained by:…”
Section: Pll Principle and Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these data are not available, the characteristic P m = f (N m ) can be approximated by the slip method. In the same way, the efficiency curve can be approximated from models, database or standards [16][17][18][19]. One important point is the sensitivity of these two models to the accuracy of the speed estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing demand for the use of small AC motors has stimulated research related to the development and enhancement of techniques for the measurement of the motors' efficiency, and for the computation of the associated accuracy [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], where we provide a short review of the related research papers. In Reference [9], a comparative analysis of direct and indirect efficiency estimation techniques was presented for a 3 kW, three-phase induction motor, and it was concluded that the direct determination of efficiency should be used for all sizes of induction motors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors recommended the use of the direct method rather than the indirect method for three-phase motors with power ratings ≤1 kW. In Reference [20], the authors proposed the use of a combination of genetic algorithms to estimate the efficiency of an induction motor, where the uncertainty for a rated output power of 3 kW, was only 0.3%, which was within the acceptable range of accuracy. In Reference [21], the same authors showed that the difference between the measured efficiency (direct method) and the efficiency estimated by the authors' technique (indirect method) was only 0.25%, for a rated power of 3 kW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructing different operating points under different test conditions and using pulse-width modulation technology to control the excitation can also produce satisfactory results [17]. Going further, the genetic algorithm has been applied to induction motor efficiency estimation by the DC test, voltages, currents, input power, and speed measurements [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%