Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures and Infrastructures 2014
DOI: 10.1201/b16387-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel machine-learning approach for structural state identification using ultrasonic guided waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current SHM and DP research efforts have focused on utilizing either, ground-based (pre-flight) or in-flight modal testing [6,7], ultrasonic guided waves [8,9], or acoustic emission monitoring [10,11], using sparse sensor arrays that rely on large detailed correlated computational models. These methods have shortfalls that make it unrealistic for actual flight vehicles having large, complex internal structures assembled using skins, stringers, spars and frames, operating in complex, varying environments.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current SHM and DP research efforts have focused on utilizing either, ground-based (pre-flight) or in-flight modal testing [6,7], ultrasonic guided waves [8,9], or acoustic emission monitoring [10,11], using sparse sensor arrays that rely on large detailed correlated computational models. These methods have shortfalls that make it unrealistic for actual flight vehicles having large, complex internal structures assembled using skins, stringers, spars and frames, operating in complex, varying environments.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…), variation in boundary conditions, sensor and structural aging, and measurement noise among others, as well as the sensing network layout itself. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Usually, the uncertainties due to environmental effects have the largest impact on the system performance. An SHM system needs to be robust to uncertainties, but sensitive enough to detect the required minimum damage even when the sensor data are ''corrupted'' by these uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward this end, statistical tools and machine learning algorithms are used to effectively tackle the detection and estimation problems. 16,23,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] SHM technologies, oftentimes in combination with appropriate NDE and/or health and usage monitoring systems (HUMS), along with sophisticated data management systems and life-prediction models constitute the required steps for the transition to condition-based maintenance (CBM). Typically, SHM methods involve the detection, monitoring, evaluation, and assessment of an adverse event that may affect the structural health state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results showed that a satisfactory damage detection rate was achieved. Roy et al 7 presented a structural damage detection model based on an unsupervised learning technique. In this novelty detection approach, a neural-network-based sparse auto-encoder algorithm was integrated into a statistical outlier analysis method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%