2018
DOI: 10.2991/ijcis.11.1.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel MAGDM Approach With Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Sets

Abstract: In this paper, we propose an extension of hesitant fuzzy sets, i.e., proportional hesitant fuzzy sets (PHFSs), with the purpose of accommodating proportional hesitant fuzzy environments. The components of PHFSs, which are referred to as proportional hesitant fuzzy elements (PHFEs), contain two aspects of information provided by a decision-making team: the possible membership degrees in the hesitant fuzzy elements and their associated proportions. Based on the PHFSs, we provide a novel approach to addressing fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike other developments, this scheme is indeed a unified mechanism and is easily applicable to many real life decision-making problems without enlarging the computational burden. Motivated by [14,22], in the following, we design the TOPSIS in the PDHFS regard. This decision raking procedure involves the following steps.…”
Section: Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike other developments, this scheme is indeed a unified mechanism and is easily applicable to many real life decision-making problems without enlarging the computational burden. Motivated by [14,22], in the following, we design the TOPSIS in the PDHFS regard. This decision raking procedure involves the following steps.…”
Section: Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, the detailed comparative analysis is presented with the traditional approach and Ref. [22] approach to illustrate the essentiality of our proposed scheme.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the Proposed Decision-making Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typical multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) structures often involve the following three components: (1) evaluation of various alternatives against certain attributes, (2) determination of the attributes weights reflecting the preference of a decision maker, and (3) aggregation of the attributes evaluations taking account of the attributes weights [1]. A considerable number of MADM methodologies and theories have been developed and applied in a wide range of fields, such as bid evaluation, enterprise strategy planning, quality assessment, and product recommendation [2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, in many decision-making scenarios, decision makers do not always follow the above procedures in a stepwise manner, since they usually have some rough idea in the first place of the appropriate outputs for some prototype inputs [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%