2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel mechanism for electron-cyclotron maser

Abstract: Context. It has been a long-standing puzzle on how to produce natural radio bursts of various cosmic objects, ranging from remote active galactic nuclei and pulsars to the nearest solar radio bursts and terrestrial auroral kilometer radiations.Aims. An electron-cyclotron maser (ECM) driven by fast electron beams trapped in magnetic fields has been suggested as a dominant mechanism of producing natural high-power radio radiation. However, there have been two serious difficulties: the magnetization condition of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Wu et al [], in the low‐frequency ( ω ≪ ω ci ≪ ω ce ) and long‐wavelength ( k ρ ce ≪ k ρ ci ≪1) limits the current instability of AWs by the beam‐return current system can be dealt with by the hydromagnetic limit of the kinetic theory [ Hasegawa , ; D. J. Wu , ]. For the parallel propagating AW with a wave vector k = (0,0, k z ), the dispersion equation of the beam‐return current system reads as [ Wu et al , ] ω2ωci2+αnormalQωωnormalci()αnormalJ+kzλnormalikzλnormali=0, where the parameters αnormalQennormalQen0=n0nnormalennormalbn0 with n Q ≡ n 0 − n e − n b and αnormalJjzen0vnormalA=nnormalevnormale+nnormalbvnormalbn0vnormalA with jze()nnormalevnormale+nnormalbvnormalb are the normalized charge and current density of the beam‐return current system, respectively, and λ i ≡ v A / ω ci is the ion inertial length.…”
Section: Current Instability and Self‐generated Aw Of Beam‐return Curmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Following Wu et al [], in the low‐frequency ( ω ≪ ω ci ≪ ω ce ) and long‐wavelength ( k ρ ce ≪ k ρ ci ≪1) limits the current instability of AWs by the beam‐return current system can be dealt with by the hydromagnetic limit of the kinetic theory [ Hasegawa , ; D. J. Wu , ]. For the parallel propagating AW with a wave vector k = (0,0, k z ), the dispersion equation of the beam‐return current system reads as [ Wu et al , ] ω2ωci2+αnormalQωωnormalci()αnormalJ+kzλnormalikzλnormali=0, where the parameters αnormalQennormalQen0=n0nnormalennormalbn0 with n Q ≡ n 0 − n e − n b and αnormalJjzen0vnormalA=nnormalevnormale+nnormalbvnormalbn0vnormalA with jze()nnormalevnormale+nnormalbvnormalb are the normalized charge and current density of the beam‐return current system, respectively, and λ i ≡ v A / ω ci is the ion inertial length.…”
Section: Current Instability and Self‐generated Aw Of Beam‐return Curmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the limit case with complete compensation (i.e., n Q =0 and j z =0), one has the parameters αnormalQ=00.3em0.3em0.3emand0.3em0.3em0.3emαnormalJ=0, which give the well‐known dispersion relation for the ideal AW, ω = v A k z . Another limit case without compensation (i.e., n Q =− n b and j z =− e n b v b ) has the parameters αnormalQ=nnormalbn00.3em0.3em0.3emand0.3em0.3em0.3emαnormalJ=nnormalbvnormalbn0vnormalA=αnormalQvnormalbvnormalA, for which the dispersion relation was considered by Wu et al [] and called the self‐generated AW.…”
Section: Current Instability and Self‐generated Aw Of Beam‐return Curmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations