1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6882690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for estimating heritability using molecular markers

Abstract: Heritability is usually estimated with individuals of known relatedness generated using a controlled breeding programme or through response to selection. In this paper, we use two single-locus VNTR DNA fingerprint markers in conjunction with a maximum likelihood method to infer relatedness among pairs of individuals in a captive population of Pacific chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Patterns of relatedness inferred from the two DNA fingerprint markers were used to estimate heritability for, and genet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its great intuitive appeal, an unexpectedly reduced number of cases applying this method have been published either on plant or animal populations. Most representative examples are in Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Mousseau et al 1998), Ovis aries (Thomas et al 2002), and Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wilson et al 2003). Klaper et al (2001), estimating the heritability of phenolic compounds in a population of Quercus laevis, showed that the method failed to estimate heritability because of the low and rather uniform coancestry among individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite its great intuitive appeal, an unexpectedly reduced number of cases applying this method have been published either on plant or animal populations. Most representative examples are in Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Mousseau et al 1998), Ovis aries (Thomas et al 2002), and Oncorhynchus mykiss (Wilson et al 2003). Klaper et al (2001), estimating the heritability of phenolic compounds in a population of Quercus laevis, showed that the method failed to estimate heritability because of the low and rather uniform coancestry among individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Alternatively, if prior information is available on population structure, likelihood-based procedures may be implemented, in which pairs are placed into a predetermined population structure according to the probability of observing their genotype and phenotype (Mousseau et al 1998;Thomas et al , 2002. A third approach involves an explicit reconstruction of groups of a certain coancestry, which can then be used as pedigree information in a standard quantitative genetic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemberton 2008;Kruuk et al 2008). A range of similar approaches are currently available for pedigree construction (see Mousseau et al 1998;Ritland 2000;Wang 2004;Thomas 2005) and the consequences of imprecision on the subject under study can be to some extent anticipated (Pemberton 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Currently, analysis of relatedness has been used to estimate genetic components of variance of phenotypic trait in outbred populations (e.g. Mousseau et al, 1998), and thus can potentially be used in conservation to quantify the amount of phenotypically important genetic variation in endangered populations (Storfer, 1996;Carvajal-Rodríguez et al, 2005;Thomas, 2005). Furthermore information about the kin structure of populations can help inform conservation decisions (Regnaut et al, 2006).…”
Section: Relatedness and Pedigree Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point estimates can then be obtained by maximising the likelihood (Milligan, 2003). One use of the likelihood approach has been to estimate heritability in outbred populations (Mousseau et al 1998). For each pair of individuals the likelihood of the joint genotypes and phenotypes can be calculated as a function of the degree of relationship and parameters in a quantitative genetic model, which can then be inferred.…”
Section: Relatedness and Pedigree Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%