2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method for estimation of aerosol radiance and its extrapolation in the atmospheric correction of satellite data over optically complex oceanic waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major difference is that a biogenic optical model is used in the satellites for regulating the inter-band water reflectance rather than polynomial relationships as in GOCI's case. Atmospheric correction algorithms that assume inter-band relationship for aerosol reflectance [16,17] also seem vulnerable to this type of radiometric artefact that has band-specific effects. While the regulation of the shape of aerosol reflectance makes the estimation of aerosol reflectance less sensitive to the band-specific artefact, the effect of the artefact would be then more salient in the estimated water reflectance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A major difference is that a biogenic optical model is used in the satellites for regulating the inter-band water reflectance rather than polynomial relationships as in GOCI's case. Atmospheric correction algorithms that assume inter-band relationship for aerosol reflectance [16,17] also seem vulnerable to this type of radiometric artefact that has band-specific effects. While the regulation of the shape of aerosol reflectance makes the estimation of aerosol reflectance less sensitive to the band-specific artefact, the effect of the artefact would be then more salient in the estimated water reflectance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a quality control process that screened the in situ measurements for poor-quality data [9], 26 match-up pairs between the in situ and the GOCI R rs were identified in the GOCI data over three days (31 July 2012, 16 October 2012, and 23 October 2013), which are dates that had strong SLRI in the corresponding L1B images. Since GOCI images were taken every hour, the maximum time difference between in situ measurements and the corresponding GOCI data is 30 min if the in situ data were collected between 00:16 UTC and 07:46 UTC.…”
Section: Study Area and Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was achieved by calculating the aerosol reflectance and type from a cross-calibration process that makes use of a 5 × 5 grid of pixels from less turbid waters. A method developed for MODIS corrects for the contributions from suspended sediments in the Rayleigh-corrected radiance at 748 nm and then uses this value to estimate the aerosol contribution at 531 nm [219]. This technique might show some benefits over the turbid waters off the south coast of India [219].…”
Section: Black Pixel Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method developed for MODIS corrects for the contributions from suspended sediments in the Rayleigh-corrected radiance at 748 nm and then uses this value to estimate the aerosol contribution at 531 nm [219]. This technique might show some benefits over the turbid waters off the south coast of India [219]. A summary of atmospheric correction approaches that make the black pixel assumption can be seen in Table 2 [39,110,151,[206][207][208][209]217,218,220,221].…”
Section: Black Pixel Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%