A Novel Method for Resolving and Completing Authors’ Country Affiliation Data in Bibliographic Records

Nguyen, Ba Xuan; Dinneen, Jesse David; Luczak‐Roesch, Markus

doi:10.2478/jdis-2020-0020

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The statistical software environment R with its igraph package was used to identify the RCs between countries from bibliographic information of co-authored publications in the data. We applied a method of completing authors’ country affiliation data in MAG records [ 34 ] to resolve missing data. Information about scientific factors ‐ numbers of total publications and international co-authored publications ‐ are extracted from this data source to investigate the research collaborations of CANZUK countries.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s

Nguyen,

Luczak-Roesch,

Dinneen

2024

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although previous studies of today’s globalised and competitive research landscape have mentioned the research collaborations of CANZUK countries (i.e., Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom), none have yet studied them in detail. Further, such studies have used different measures of international research collaboration (IRC), resulting in disparate findings. This paper, therefore, analyses the strengths of CANZUK research collaborations, how those collaborations have changed over time, and assesses the effect of three ways of measures on the results (absolute strength, bilateral similarity, and multilateral similarity). We provide a detailed characterisation of the CANZUK research network and its relationships with partner countries, which reveals that the most collaborative CANZUK countries are the UK and Australia, among other findings. We also confirm that many findings differ depending on which measures are used. We offer an explanation of this difference with reference to the nature of the measures (i.e., what they really measure) and make suggestions for suitable measures in future studies depending on their purpose. Finally, we discuss how this study’s findings can be used by research policy makers (in CANZUK and elsewhere) in deciding on research strategy and by researchers in appropriately measuring IRC.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s

Nguyen,

Luczak-Roesch,

Dinneen

2024

PLoS ONE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We conducted a bibliometric analysis of geomorphological mapping research papers published in English between 2000 and 2021. The analysis used the Web of Science (WoS) database using the Advanced search function [39][40][41]. We used the search terms "geomorphology" and "geomorphological" in combination with "mapping".…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geomorphological Mapping Global Trends and Applications

Quesada-Román,

Peralta-Reyes

2023

Geographies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 735 research papers on geomorphological mapping published in English between 2000 and 2021 using the Web of Science database. The analysis focuses on key metrics such as annual publication rates, journal distribution, common keywords, and frequently cited papers. The results demonstrate sustained investment in geomorphological mapping research over the past two decades, driven by advancements in data analysis, GIS technologies, and cross-institutional and cross-country collaboration. While European universities and research centers lead the field, researchers from Latin America and Asia are also making noteworthy contributions. However, research concentration remains largely in Europe, particularly at low altitudes. The study highlights the vital importance of investment in geomorphological mapping research and the benefits of collaboration to advance understanding and knowledge production. It also emphasizes the need for greater geographic and cultural diversity among researchers to ensure a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to research in this field.

show abstract

“…Information about numbers of total publications and international co-authored publications were extracted from this data source and processed using the R statistical analysis program. To resolve the missing authors' country affiliation information in MAG, we used a method that enriches data by sourcing corresponding information from Wikidata (i.e., matches affiliation data like institution names to their parent countries), which we developed in previous work and validated with the MAG data set in particular (Nguyen et al, 2020 ). As most of the previous IRC network studies have examined the collaborative network maps in the period 1981–2000 ( Table 1 ), this paper also compared the CANZUK's RCs in this period with those in the periods before and after.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Closed Shop or Collaborative Hub? An Analysis of the Partners' Importance in CANZUK Countries' Research Collaborations

Nguyen

Dinneen²,

Luczak‐Roesch³

2022

Front. Res. Metr. Anal.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative partners are important in international research collaboration. The research collaborations between four CANZUK countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom) are examined to see whether their research connections are different from the research relationships with other countries. This paper measures the affinity index values and analyses the development of research collaborations among CANZUK countries with those between the CANZUK and other countries. The whole counting method and the fractional counting method are applied in this study to compare the differences in the results. The findings show that although the affinity index values of CANZUK countries were decreasing over time, the importance of CANZUK partners to CANZUK countries has likely increased over time at the expense of the other partners' importance. The study also shows the minor differences in results obtained by applying two different counting methods. These differences can be explained by the nature of the counting methods, and the choice to use either one of these two counting methods should be considered in other international research collaboration studies.

show abstract

A Novel Method for Resolving and Completing Authors’ Country Affiliation Data in Bibliographic Records

Cited by 9 publications

References 29 publications

Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s

Do research collaborations age like wine? Absolute and relative measures of CANZUK research partnerships’ strength since the 1950s

Geomorphological Mapping Global Trends and Applications

Closed Shop or Collaborative Hub? An Analysis of the Partners' Importance in CANZUK Countries' Research Collaborations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About