A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model

Ye, Feng; Sun, Jun; Wang, Yuyun; Nedjah, Nadia; Bu, Wei

doi:10.1016/j.jik.2022.100289

Cited by 22 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The G1 method, an improved weight assignment approach based on AHP, does not call for the creation of a judgment matrix or a consistency test, is simple to calculate, and has good operability. 28 The G1 method, however, suffers from the issue of fixed relative importance of indicators, and expert specialists' subjective assessment of relative importance will result in an excessively wide gap between the maximum and minimum values of the weight of index elements. In order to address this issue, it is suggested in this study that Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL be added to the G1 empowerment process, and that the method of having experts determine the order relationship be changed to make G1 empowerment more flexible and rational.…”

Section: Determine the Index Weights Based On The Pfdematel-g1 Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emergency management capability evaluation of chemical parks based on PFDEMATEL‐G1 and PFTOPSIS

Zhang

Lang

You

et al. 2023

Process Safety Progress

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conducting an evaluation of the emergency management capacity of the chemical park and implementing targeted improvements based on the assessment results can significantly enhance the emergency preparedness and response capabilities of both the management departments and enterprises. This article proposes an emergency management capability assessment model for chemical parks based on PFDEMATEL (the Pythagorean fuzzy decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory)‐G1 (the ordinal relation method) and PFTOPSIS (the Pythagorean fuzzy set TOPSIS). Firstly, based on the four stages of emergency management of chemical parks, emergency prevention, emergency preparedness, emergency response, and emergency recovery, an index system for evaluating the emergency management capacity of chemical parks was established. Secondly, PFDEMATEL is used to modify the G1 method to determine the index weight, so as to realize the objective rationality of the G1 method empowerment. On this basis, an emergency management capability evaluation model of chemical park to improve PFTOPSIS is proposed. Finally, taking three chemical parks as examples, the applicability of the evaluation model is verified. The research results can provide a theoretical reference for the emergency management decision‐making of governments and enterprises, improve the status quo of emergency management, and improve the prevention and handling capabilities of emergencies.

show abstract

Section: Determine the Index Weights Based On The Pfdematel-g1 Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emergency management capability evaluation of chemical parks based on PFDEMATEL‐G1 and PFTOPSIS

Zhang

Lang

You

et al. 2023

Process Safety Progress

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The G1 method has the advantages of fast calculation, no consistency test, and strong stretching of the number of elements in the same level compared to the AHP. [11][12][13]. In addition, C-OWA allows us to combine numbers and assign extreme data to low-impact locations and target data to high-impact locations as well as integrate and assign weights to each metric, which greatly reduces the impact of subjective scores and results in more realistic weights that improve the level of application.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

Risk management of hydrogenation station PPP project based on 3D framework—A case study in China

Zhao,

Yu,

Cheng

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Renewable hydrogen energy has received growing attention due to the energy shortage and increasing CO2 emissions. With these issues in mind, renewable hydrogen has become an important component of future energy systems in many countries, especially in the transportation sector. However, the shortage of hydrogenation station and the risks associated with their construction have become an urgent issue for the development of hydrogen energy transportation. To better implement the hydrogenation station project, a risk management framework is proposed for risk control. First, a comprehensive risk index system is developed, using a weighting method based on the G1 method and the C-OWA operator. Second, a grey fuzzy synthetic assessment method is applied to evaluate the risk based on the 3D risk assessment framework. Finally, risk is assigned to different participants and actionable measures are proposed. This paper summarizes the obstacles to the development of hydrogen energy transportation, highlights the potential of hydrogen energy development, and suggests workable solutions for the use of hydrogen energy in the future transportation industry.

show abstract

“…Historically, the performance of distribution networks was assessed primarily through technical indicators such as reliability, power quality, and loss rates. As the energy landscape evolved, with increased focus on sustainability, customer satisfaction, and integration of distributed energy resources, the range of evaluation indicators has expanded significantly [7] . Technical indicators remain the cornerstone of distribution network performance evaluation.…”

Section: Introduction 1importance Of Performance Evaluation In Distri...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrative Performance Assessment of Electrical Distribution Networks: An Integrated Indicators and Weight Processing Strategy

Hu,

Chai,

Jing

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents a novel framework This study proposes a new framework for evaluating the performance of distribution networks using a comprehensive approach. This method combines Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for extracting key performance indicators, Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (IAHP) for determining objective weights of these indicators, and CRITIC method for determining subjective weights. Then, aggregate weights are used to calculate the comprehensive performance score of each part of the distribution network. On the premise of reducing computing resources, K-means clustering analysis is applied to classify the status of distribution network projects, providing data reference for project maintenance and repair. Finally, a case study and corresponding analysis of the evaluation results were presented, providing detailed insights into the practical application of the proposed framework. The limitations of current research and future research approaches were also discussed. The results indicate that the designed strategy performs well in terms of accuracy and computational convenience, and has potential application prospects

show abstract

A novel method for the performance evaluation of institutionalized collaborative innovation using an improved G1-CRITIC comprehensive evaluation model

Cited by 22 publications

References 17 publications

Emergency management capability evaluation of chemical parks based on PFDEMATEL‐G1 and PFTOPSIS

Emergency management capability evaluation of chemical parks based on PFDEMATEL‐G1 and PFTOPSIS

Risk management of hydrogenation station PPP project based on 3D framework—A case study in China

Integrative Performance Assessment of Electrical Distribution Networks: An Integrated Indicators and Weight Processing Strategy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About