2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel method of donor‒recipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: A total cardiac volume‒predictive model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike in adults, donor gender is also commonly accounted for when assessing organ size for pediatric recipients given discrepancies in thoracic volume and heart size depending upon the child's age and gender. Our group is working to define the optimal method for heart size‐matching for children, with a focus on accurate total cardiac volume (TCV) measurements, but until a validated and clinically reliable method exists to determine TCV, the applications—and limitations—of traditional gender‐ and size‐matching warrant further discussion 13–15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike in adults, donor gender is also commonly accounted for when assessing organ size for pediatric recipients given discrepancies in thoracic volume and heart size depending upon the child's age and gender. Our group is working to define the optimal method for heart size‐matching for children, with a focus on accurate total cardiac volume (TCV) measurements, but until a validated and clinically reliable method exists to determine TCV, the applications—and limitations—of traditional gender‐ and size‐matching warrant further discussion 13–15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many, including the authors' group, have advocated for the widespread implementation of improved and more precise measurements to ensure optimal size‐matching between recipient and donor, but the most commonly utilized method remains the DRWR 14,19,23–25 . The lower limit of DRWR acceptability is typically cited as a ratio of 0.8, with “oversizing” commonly defined as >1.5 1,7,9,10,21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, heart transplantation performed during the neonatal period is a durable therapy for infants with congenital heart disease, and associated with a minimal need for re-intervention [17]. However, the primary limiting factor is the shortage of donors [17][18][19]. The same holds true for lung transplantation in young infants with surfactant dysfunction disorders and congenital diseases [5,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, kidney and liver transplantation show good results even with size and/or weight mismatched organs [22][23][24]. Organ size matching is more delicate for heart and lung transplantation [18,21]. Despite surgical organ-specific technical challenges, every neonatal donor could reduce waiting list mortality of small pediatric recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%