2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel model of costly technical efficiency

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Highlights • A novel model of technical inefficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect the term 'rational' is fully consistent with the classification of Bogetoft and Hougaard (2003) who argue that that inefficiency in some cases may be the outcome of a rational choice (see also Tsionas and Izzeldin, 2018). The decomposition of cost inefficiency into its constituent parts allows us to examine their evolution over the sample period, and the speed of decline of this respective inefficiency.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In this respect the term 'rational' is fully consistent with the classification of Bogetoft and Hougaard (2003) who argue that that inefficiency in some cases may be the outcome of a rational choice (see also Tsionas and Izzeldin, 2018). The decomposition of cost inefficiency into its constituent parts allows us to examine their evolution over the sample period, and the speed of decline of this respective inefficiency.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, mechanization of industry has propagated the need to include other inputs in the form of capital, material and energy as the important factors of production (Blackburn, 1991;Jacobs and Chase, 2011). The existing literature (Hilmola, 2007;Wu, 2009;Grieco and McDevitt, 2012;Jola-Sanchez et al, 2016;Tang, 2017;Tsionas and Izzeldin, 2018) defines this as total factor productivity (TFP) or multifactor productivity (MFP) or total productivity. The factors which influence TFP are numerous that includes useable knowledge (Kuznets, 1966;Lovell, 2003;Xue et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2013;Kapelko et al, 2014), difference in technological advances, resistance to the use of better technologies (Mokyr, 1990;Pinto and Prescott, 1990), differences in working environment and practices, firm size and age (Little et al, 1987;Lundvall and Battese, 2000;Cheng and Lo, 2004;Dubey et al, 2017;Duman and Kasman, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases the R 2 's drop dramatically indicating that these variables should be present in the reduced form. Similarly to other empirical studies (see for example Tsionas and Izzeldin, 2018), we compute autocorrelation functions (acf) for each parameter to examine autocorrelation of MCMC draws. In Figure 9, we report the maximal values of autocorrelation coefficients estimated at the median (50 th percentile) and at the 10 th and 90 th percentile of w (the particular point at which we consider the local likelihood / posterior) for each lag from 1 to 50 (in absolute values but retaining the sign for plotting).…”
Section: Diagnostic Procedures For Bayesian Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are at least three crucial shortcomings with this approach. First, the inputs are endogenous (also known as "simultaneity bias problem") as is well known from previous studies (Tsionas and Izzeldin, 2018;De Loecker, 2007) because under a variety of behavioral assumptions, they are correlated with the productivity component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%