2017
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel molecular diagnostics platform for somatic and germline precision oncology

Abstract: BackgroundNext‐generation sequencing (NGS) opens new options in clinical oncology, from therapy selection to genetic counseling. However, realization of this potential not only requires succeeding in the bioinformatics and interpretation of the results, but also in their integration into the clinical practice. We have developed a novel NGS diagnostic platform aimed at detecting (1) somatic genomic alterations associated with the response to approved targeted cancer therapies and (2) germline mutations predispo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 23 NSCLC samples, 69.57% (16/23) of the patients carried the mutations with available matched targeted therapeutic options (Table III). This proportion is consistent with the previous study (23). In this study, EGFR mutations which occurred in exon 18–21 were the most common mutations carried by 14 patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Among the 23 NSCLC samples, 69.57% (16/23) of the patients carried the mutations with available matched targeted therapeutic options (Table III). This proportion is consistent with the previous study (23). In this study, EGFR mutations which occurred in exon 18–21 were the most common mutations carried by 14 patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Five pathogenic TP53 variants were identified according to the variant classification criteria described by Cabanillas et al, 2017 [36]. The overall prevalence of these variants was 6.4% (5/78), a percentage that rises to 9.4% if we consider only patients who were diagnosed before the age of 36 (5/53).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pipeline data analysis was performed as described by Cabanillas et al, 2017 [36]. Briefly, FASTQ files were evaluated using quality checks from Fast QC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enriched libraries were sequenced (2 × 101 bp) in an Illumina HiSeq4000 sequencer. WES results were processed using the bioinformatics software HD Genome One (DREAMgenics, Oviedo, Spain), certified with IVD/CE-marking (see Supplementary Materials for a comprehensive description of the exome analysis, [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]). The datasets generated during the study are available in the European Nucleotide Archive repository [48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%