2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel non-stoichiometric medium-entropy carbide stabilized by anion vacancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these HE ceramics, HE carbides should be possibly stable with some content of carbon vacancies similar to the singlecomponent carbides composed of the HE carbides. [34][35][36][37][38] In this work, we report a non-stoichiometric HE carbide ceramics with in-situ formed silicon carbide second phase prepared by reactive sintering based on the in-situ reaction between HE carbide and the added silicon. The addition content of silicon is 5 wt% in the present study and the theoretical content of carbon vacancy in the formed non-stoichiometric HE carbide based on the reaction ( 1) is x = 0.23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these HE ceramics, HE carbides should be possibly stable with some content of carbon vacancies similar to the singlecomponent carbides composed of the HE carbides. [34][35][36][37][38] In this work, we report a non-stoichiometric HE carbide ceramics with in-situ formed silicon carbide second phase prepared by reactive sintering based on the in-situ reaction between HE carbide and the added silicon. The addition content of silicon is 5 wt% in the present study and the theoretical content of carbon vacancy in the formed non-stoichiometric HE carbide based on the reaction ( 1) is x = 0.23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work highlighted the use of nonstoichiometric boride TiB 1.5 as a raw material to prepare high‐entropy boride ceramics. In the ideal model, the configurational entropy of covalently bonded compounds can be calculated according to the following formula () 30 : Smix=R()i=1Nxilnxication+j=0.28em1Mxjlnxjanion$$\begin{eqnarray} {S_{{\rm{mix}}}} = - R\left[ {{{\left( {\mathop \sum \limits_{i{\rm{\; = \;1}}}^N {x_i}\ln {x_i}} \right)}_{{\rm{cation}}}} + \left. {{{\left( {\mathop \sum \limits_{j\;{\rm{ = \;1}}}^M {x_j}\ln {x_j}} \right)}_{{\rm{anion}}}}} \right]} \right.\nonumber\\[-4pt] \end{eqnarray}$$where x i and x j represent the mole fractions of elements present in the anions and cations in the compound, respectively, and R is the ideal gas constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness-load curve of B 4 C20 wt% TiH 2 is shown in Figure 9(a), revealing the obvious decrease in Vickers hardness (Hv) with increasing applied force, which was primarily attributed to the indentation size effect. An asymptotic Hv value of ~31.4 GPa was obtained when the applied load exceeded 5 N. It may be because the hardness of TiB 2 generated by the reaction is 34 GPa, and the hardness of C produced by the reaction is poor, which hardness is 1~2 GPa [32][33] , the hardness of B 4 C is 31 GPa, which hardness is between TiB 2 and C. However, the results indicate that due to very little C produced by the reaction, the hardness of B material, and C also can be used as an additive to produce high-toughness ceramic [34][35][36][37] , so the fracture toughness of B 4 C-TiB 2 composite ceramics are improved.…”
Section: Hardness and Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 96%