2019
DOI: 10.1002/nau.24242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel, nonopiod‐based treatment approach to men with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome using ultrasound‐guided nerve hydrodissection and pelvic floor musculature trigger point injections

Abstract: Introduction: Urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) represents a group of pain symptoms relating to patients with pelvic pain for which treatment is largely unsatisfactory. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of a novel treatment strategy in males suffering from UCPPS.Methods: This retrospective, institutional review board-approved study analyzed eight male patients aged 24 to 61 with UCPPS. All the patients had a trial of antibiotic therapy, NSAIDs, and pelvic floor physical therap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While no trial compared risks and benefits for palpation‐guided therapeutic injection against ultrasound‐guided therapeutic injection in the perianal area, ultrasound‐ or EMG‐guided therapeutic injections for muscular skeletal disorders have demonstrated superior accuracy compared with palpation‐guided injections [35,36]. Ultrasound‐guided BTXA injection in the perineum has increased in popularity in recent years [37,38]. In addition, although the rate of needle‐stick injury associated with palpation‐guided injections was not reported, blind injection in the perianal region towards the clinician’s finger seems to pose an unnecessary risk, given the potential for transmission of blood‐borne diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no trial compared risks and benefits for palpation‐guided therapeutic injection against ultrasound‐guided therapeutic injection in the perianal area, ultrasound‐ or EMG‐guided therapeutic injections for muscular skeletal disorders have demonstrated superior accuracy compared with palpation‐guided injections [35,36]. Ultrasound‐guided BTXA injection in the perineum has increased in popularity in recent years [37,38]. In addition, although the rate of needle‐stick injury associated with palpation‐guided injections was not reported, blind injection in the perianal region towards the clinician’s finger seems to pose an unnecessary risk, given the potential for transmission of blood‐borne diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, 2 small studies and 1 larger study of 73 women regarding its efficacy for different subpopulations of patients with CPP have shown promising results, particularly in decreasing pain and improving intercourse, sleep, and ability to go to work and sit. 54 , 77 , 84 The main limitations of these studies are that none were powered, follow-up time was short, and their retrospective design prevented the existence of control groups. 54 , 84 They set the stage for future larger prospective randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 54 , 77 , 84 The main limitations of these studies are that none were powered, follow-up time was short, and their retrospective design prevented the existence of control groups. 54 , 84 They set the stage for future larger prospective randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We aim to treat the underlying myofascial pain syndrome and neurogenic pain seen in CPP patients with our outpatient neuromuscular protocol. The effectiveness of our protocol has been studied for men and women with CPP 5,6 . The current study was performed to provide additional data for the efficacy of our protocol with a much greater sample size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of our protocol has been studied for men and women with CPP. 5,6 The current study was performed to provide additional data for the efficacy of our protocol with a much greater sample size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%