2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel optimal preventive maintenance policy for a cold standby system based on semi-Markov theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the repair is also considered for the standby system [9]. It causes the problem of maintenance policy and surveillance testing [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the repair is also considered for the standby system [9]. It causes the problem of maintenance policy and surveillance testing [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the acquisition of highly reliable components is often more expensive than the addition of redundant components, redundancy has been widely applied. Primary examples include those instances where operational safety is a key concern, such as aircraft controls, nuclear power plants, and larger telecommunication networks …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of maintenance polices for repairable systems has been a subject of investigation for decades. Some of these works focus on systems with hot redundancy, such as Flammini et al and Gray, others discuss systems structured as k ‐out‐of‐N components, such as Kapur and Kapoor, Kumar, and Lapa et al, and many of them address cold standby systems, such as Osaki, Sim, Myers and Rauzy, Okasha and Frangopol, Taghipour et al, Zhang and Wang, and Zhong and Jin …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the effect of repair is important for determining optimum maintenance policy (Scarf, 1997;Dekker & Scarf, 1998;Wang, 2002;Xiang, 2013;Zhong & Jin, 2014;Kirschenmann, Popova, Damien, & Hanson, 2014) and modelling the repair effect has attracted considerable research (e.g., Malik, 1979;Nakagawa, 1988;Kijima, 1989;Doyen & Gaudoin, 2004;Guo, Liao, Zhao, & Mettas, 2007;Wu & Zuo, 2010). The repair effect can be accommodated by a number of means, such as modification of the failure intensity or reduction of the virtual age of the system.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%