2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16214088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Preference Elicitation Technique Based on a Graph Model and Its Application to a Brownfield Redevelopment Conflict in China

Abstract: Disputes are very common and pervasive in brownfield redevelopment projects, in which multiple stakeholders or decision-makers (DMs) strategically interact with each other with a conflict of interest. The preference information of DMs involved plays a vital role in identifying possible outcomes or resolutions for resolving a tough brownfield conflict. In this research, a novel preference ranking technique is purposefully proposed within the graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) paradigm to effectively and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of the annual number of publications and trends between China and the international community shows that there are only 95 publications on landfill site assessment methods, which is less than 8% of the total number of international publications. The discussion of the asset assessment of known or suspected contaminated sites was initiated in 1984 in North American countries such as the USA and Canada [88], but the research in this area was only re-emphasized in 2013 and development has been slow.…”
Section: Landfill Site Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the annual number of publications and trends between China and the international community shows that there are only 95 publications on landfill site assessment methods, which is less than 8% of the total number of international publications. The discussion of the asset assessment of known or suspected contaminated sites was initiated in 1984 in North American countries such as the USA and Canada [88], but the research in this area was only re-emphasized in 2013 and development has been slow.…”
Section: Landfill Site Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the two traditional methods in the GMCR, i.e., option prioritizing and option weighting, are easily affected by subjective factors such as the cognitions, attitudes, and values of researchers or experts. If a researcher does not provide reasonable and sufficient preference statements or if the assessment is conducted by different researchers or experts, the preference rankings results are very likely to be different (Zhao and Xu, 2019). In addition, most cooperative or non-cooperative game models focus only on performing qualitative analysis of water conflicts without considering the dynamic evolution of such conflicts (Yuan et al, 2020;Zomorodian et al, 2017).…”
Section: Advantages Over Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these approaches of the GMCR have the advantages of simplicity and usability, the evaluation results are easily affected by subjective factors such as the cognitions, attitudes, and values of researchers or experts (Zhao and Xu, 2019). Based on classical game theory, a change in the strategy options of DMs is determined by the benefits of strategic behavior (Madani, 2010;Nazari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of the complex and contested way these brownfield sites are perceived, participatory land use planning, in which preferences of stakeholders are taken into account, is crucial to their successful redevelopment (Harclerode et al 2015; Pizzol et al 2016; Rizzo et al 2015). Research has indicated the importance of understanding the potential differences among stakeholders to the success of regeneration projects on urban brownfield sites (Glumac, Han, and Schaefer 2015; Kim and Miller 2017; Martinát et al 2015; Ruelle, Halleux, and Teller 2013; Zhao and Xu 2019); this is likely also to be the case for rural brownfields. However, stakeholders' preferences differ widely and are strongly influenced by factors such as real lived experience with brownfield sites (Hadar, Danziger, and Hertwig 2018), whether the site has been (or is to be) fully or partially reused (Figure 2) (Ruelle et al 2013), the type of reuse that is proposed (Vogt et al 2015), and whether the stakeholder is a visitor (Navratil, Krejci, et al 2018) or a local community member (Maliene et al 2012).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brownfield may be remediated (improved or modified for new use)in many ways (Burinskienė et al 2017; Glumac et al 2015; Loures, Panagopoulos, and Burley 2016; Maliene et al 2012; Sinnett and Sardo 2020), for example, industry (Martinat et al 2016), housing (Glumac and Islam 2020), cultural and/or retail centers (Maliene et al 2012), educational centers (Zhao and Xu 2019), leisure facilities (De Sousa and Spiess 2018), open green spaces like parks (De Sousa 2006; Loures 2015) or “industrial forests” (Franz, Gueles, and Prey 2008), museums detailing former usage (Martinat et al 2018), or may even be returned to its former use (Schwarz et al 2009). In urban areas, residents' preferences for remediation varied widely (Greenberg and Lewis 2000; Haase et al 2012; Loures 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%