2016
DOI: 10.1177/1729881416658174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel prosthetic knee joint with a parallel spring and damping mechanism

Abstract: Prosthetic knee joint (PKJ) is an important apparatus for trans-femoral amputees to regain walking ability. This study has two objectives: (1) to design a high performance and low-cost passive PKJ and (2) to evaluate the performance of the PKJ. In the proposed PKJ design, a four-bar linkage was employed as the mechanical structure, and parallel spring and damper were used as the two connecting rods of the four-bar linkage. With the parallel spring, the length of the connecting rod is variable and a buffer flex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The torque required to enable the wearer without human effort is approximately 67.2 Nm. 17 Therefore, the presented exoskeleton can substantially assist the patients suffering from knee disorder as it provides an external assistance of 40 Nm. Hence, the proposed KE can provide 60% of the external assistance during the SSS motion, limiting the human effort by 40%.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The torque required to enable the wearer without human effort is approximately 67.2 Nm. 17 Therefore, the presented exoskeleton can substantially assist the patients suffering from knee disorder as it provides an external assistance of 40 Nm. Hence, the proposed KE can provide 60% of the external assistance during the SSS motion, limiting the human effort by 40%.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a slight deviation in the experimental peak value is observed from the theoretical value in cycles B and C, which may be due to the unknown dynamics of the actuator during expansion or contraction. According to the book Human body dynamics , 39 the upper body (trunk, head, neck, upper and forearm, and hand) constitutes approximately 60% of the total weight of the body both for males and females, and as per the literature, 17 the maximum average torque required by the healthy male of height 178 cm and mass of 80 kg free from any musculoskeletal and neurological injuries is 67.2 Nm or 0.84 Nm/kg. The current exoskeleton design can provide a maximum torque up to 40 Nm, which accounts for 60% of the external assistive torque during the SSS motion, limiting the human effort to 40%.…”
Section: Experimental Results For Validation Of Sss Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li et al designed a four-bar mechanism robotic knee prosthesis integrated with a meniscus [18] , so that the robotic knee prosthesis can bear a larger load while exercising, and has the function of buffering shock absorption. Besides, Fu and Zhang et al also designed a four-bar robotic knee prosthesis based on parallel springs and dampers [19,20] to stably adjust the swing speed of the prosthetic knee in the swing phase and absorb vibration and maintain stability in the stance phase. To improve the cost-effectiveness of robotic knee prostheses, Arelekatti et al designed a low-cost passive four-bar prosthetic knee for daily use of amputees in developing countries [21] .…”
Section: Four-bar Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active knee prostheses have a motor or actuator unlike passive knee prostheses which increases the weight and volume of the knee prosthesis and shortens the operating time of the prosthesis due to the battery capacity. Passive knee prostheses, on the other hand, are more used in the commercial field since there is no need for batteries (Fu et al, 2016). Knee prostheses are further divided into two as single axis and polycentric prosthetic knee mechanisms with respect to their functions (Radcliffe 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%