“…Furthermore, we compared the prognostic predictive abilities of 20 different risk signatures of gliomas in TCGA from published articles, including inflammatory response-related gene (IRRG) signature ( Yan et al, 2022 ), DNA damage and repair-related gene (DDRRG) signature ( Li et al, 2022c ), CXCR members signature ( He et al, 2022 ), pyroptosis-related gene signature ( Zhang M. et al, 2021b ; Chao et al, 2022 ; Yang et al, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ), ECM-related gene (ECMRG) signature ( Li et al, 2022b ), tripartite motif (TRIM) family gene signature ( Xiao et al, 2022 ), antigen presentation machinery (APM) signature ( Chen et al, 2022 ), natural killer cell-related gene (NKRG) signature ( Li C. et al, 2022a ), IL-4-related gene (IL4RG) signature ( Qi et al, 2022 ), hypoxia-related gene (HRG) signature ( Gao et al, 2021 ), S100 family-based signature ( Hu et al, 2021 ), TIME signature ( Zhang C. et al, 2021a ), focal adhesion-related gene (FARG) signature ( Li et al, 2021 ), m6A RNA methylation regulator signature ( Cong et al, 2021 ), HDAC1-related signature ( Fan et al, 2021 ), RNA-binding protein (RBP)-based signature ( Chen et al, 2021a ) and ferroptosis-related gene (FRG) signature ( Chen et al, 2021b ). The results of univariate and multivariate Cox analyses showed that our ARG signature had independent predictive ability ( p < 0.001, Table 1 ).…”