2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-006-0125-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel QSPR model for predicting θ (lower critical solution temperature) in polymer solutions using molecular descriptors

Abstract: In this study, we present a new model that has been developed for the prediction of θ (lower critical solution temperature) using a database of 169 data points that include 12 polymers and 67 solvents. For the characterization of polymer and solvent molecules, a number of molecular descriptors (topological, physicochemical,steric and electronic) were examined. The best subset of descriptors was selected using the elimination selection-stepwise regression method. Multiple linear regression (MLR) served as the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is unclear from the paper which polymer representation was used for the calculation of the connectivity indices, the best regression model (eight parameter model) yields only acceptable predictive power (R 2 = 0.77, R 2 cv = 0.77, s = 34.47 for the training set, R 2 = 0.75 for a test set) [152]. Using the same dataset, Afantitis and co-workers subsequently expanded this work by expanding the descriptor space and providing more rigorous validation [153]. The researchers produced a nine-parameter model, which shows improvements over the equation put forward by Liu et al (R 2 = 0.8860, R 2 cv = 0.8546 for the training set, R 2 = 0.8738 for the test set).…”
Section: Lower Critical Solution Temperature (Lcst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is unclear from the paper which polymer representation was used for the calculation of the connectivity indices, the best regression model (eight parameter model) yields only acceptable predictive power (R 2 = 0.77, R 2 cv = 0.77, s = 34.47 for the training set, R 2 = 0.75 for a test set) [152]. Using the same dataset, Afantitis and co-workers subsequently expanded this work by expanding the descriptor space and providing more rigorous validation [153]. The researchers produced a nine-parameter model, which shows improvements over the equation put forward by Liu et al (R 2 = 0.8860, R 2 cv = 0.8546 for the training set, R 2 = 0.8738 for the test set).…”
Section: Lower Critical Solution Temperature (Lcst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the opposite happens then an acceptable 3D-QSAR model cannot be obtained for the specific modeling method and data. 79,80 ■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The previous mentioned computational workflow (Scheme 2) was implemented in order to study the data set of the 51 pyrimidine-urea inhibitors of TNF-α production. In the following sections, the computational workflow is described in detail.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical Information and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the view of Melagraki et al [3], these methods can be roughly divided into three groups. The first group of models is those methods that have a solid theoretical background but that require vapor-liquid or liquid-liquid experimental data to adjust the unknown parameters, resulting in limited predictive ability [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%