2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02043.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel quantitative method for measuring obstruction in the upper urinary tract: The ‘obstruction coefficient’

Abstract: Objectives:To define an exact pressure-flow correlation in the upper urinary tract using an improved measurement method , to quantitatively characterize the degree of postrenal obstruction and to find a simple way of calculating it in everyday urological practice. Methods: The data of 112 cases were included in the analysis. The dynamic method of a multistep, constant pressure perfusion study was used to precisely measure a wide range of pressure-flow dependences. Values of established parameters measuring the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experimental method was implemented for a quantitative study, but the approach represents an invasive examination for patients with urinary tract dilatation without the need for nephrostomy, which is the main reason to limit the clinical application of this classical technique. Lovasz et al verified the authenticity and accuracy of the results of upper urinary tract urodynamic diagnosis in nephrostomy patients and tried to improve the experimental method for ascertaining upper urinary tract urodynamics [ 10 ], but invasive examination has not been widely used in the clinic. Therefore, in this study, experimental animals were modelled according to the classical CPP test, and multiphase volume data were collected and calculated by 640 layers of DVCT to find a noninvasive quantitative research method to calculate the urodynamics of the upper urinary tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experimental method was implemented for a quantitative study, but the approach represents an invasive examination for patients with urinary tract dilatation without the need for nephrostomy, which is the main reason to limit the clinical application of this classical technique. Lovasz et al verified the authenticity and accuracy of the results of upper urinary tract urodynamic diagnosis in nephrostomy patients and tried to improve the experimental method for ascertaining upper urinary tract urodynamics [ 10 ], but invasive examination has not been widely used in the clinic. Therefore, in this study, experimental animals were modelled according to the classical CPP test, and multiphase volume data were collected and calculated by 640 layers of DVCT to find a noninvasive quantitative research method to calculate the urodynamics of the upper urinary tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experimental method is a quantitative study, but this experiment is an invasive examination for patients with urinary tract dilatation without the need for nephrostomy, which is the main reason to limit the clinical application of this classical experiment. Lovasz S et al have verified the authenticity and accuracy of the results of upper urinary tract urodynamic diagnosis by nephrostomy patients, and tried to improve the experimental method of upper urinary tract urodynamics [10], but still invasive examination has not been widely used in clinic. Therefore, in this study, the experimental animals were modeled according to the classical CPP test, and the multi-phase volume data were collected and calculated by 640 layers of DVCT, in order to find a non-invasive quantitative research method of urodynamics of upper urinary tract.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%