2012
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.538385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel rapid prototyping and finite element method-based development of the patient-specific temporomandibular joint implant

Abstract: The approach utilised will be helpful in providing successful treatment to the deformed mandible and the mandible joints. This method allows to customise and to accurately fabricatie the implant. Advantages of this approach are that the physical model of the implant was tested for stability before the implantation, the surgeon can plan and rehearse the surgery in advance, it is a less invasive and less time-consuming surgical procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is helpful in providing successful treatment with regard to symmetry of the face and stabile occlusion and improved function of the mandible simultaneously saving operation time ( 21 ). There are not yet available long follow-up periods of these patients but it has been shown that TMJ implant has provided normal jaw function for over 2 years after surgery ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is helpful in providing successful treatment with regard to symmetry of the face and stabile occlusion and improved function of the mandible simultaneously saving operation time ( 21 ). There are not yet available long follow-up periods of these patients but it has been shown that TMJ implant has provided normal jaw function for over 2 years after surgery ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of biomechanical models to design osteosynthesis materials and implants, using the finite element (FE) method, was reported as a potential solution for failure of the materials (Deshmukh, Kuthe, Chaware, Bagaria, & Ingole, 2012; Kimura et al., 2006; Rodrigues et al., 2018). Finite element models, however, are not uniform and have a variation in required input factors such as constraints, load, mechanical properties of the bone, muscle forces and vectors.…”
Section: Optimisation Of Virtual Planning—ct and Mri Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, inexperienced or junior surgeons may want a more hands-on feel of the model to understand the complexity of the pathology, wherein 3D printing becomes essential. 3D printers started to become popular in 1980 and initially, the process of 3D printing was called rapid prototyping [5,10,[27][28][29][30][31]. STL or virtual reality modeling language (VRML) files are the standard files which are most commonly used to print the 3D model.…”
Section: Printing 3dgraphy Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%