whereas in the proposed VCO, the equivalent capacitance of the varacter and CPW resonator will decrease, which results in the higher FTR of the proposed VCO. Table 1 shows the comparison of the parameters of the proposed VCO using on-chip CPW resonator with VCO employing LC-resonator. From the table, it is noted that the VCO using CPW resonator has advantages in terms of chip size and frequency-tuning range (FTR) and comparable phase noise, and chip size is 20% less than that of the LC-VCO. Please note that the LC-VCO presented here was also designed and fabricated in the same technology by the authors for comparison purpose.
CONCLUSIONA 5 GHz-band VCO employing on-chip CPW resonator instead of LC-tank resonator was proposed, designed, and fabricated using TSMC 0.18 lm CMOS technology. The advantages of employing CPW resonator is the wide frequency-tuning range, and it also saves about 20% of chip size. The measured phase noise of the proposed VCO is comparable to the LC-VCO. Furthermore, the CPW resonator in meander structure can be designed to exploit the vacant space of the layout so the chip size can be further reduced.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS