A Novel Rescue-Tube Device for In-Water Resuscitation

Lungwitz, Yannick P; Nußbaum, Benedikt; Paulat, Klaus; Muth, Claus-Martin; Kranke, Peter; Winkler, Bernd

doi:10.3357/amhp.4133.2015

Cited by 6 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In-water resuscitation increased rescue time and the number of submersions and aspiration of water by the manikin. 54–56 The use of ventilation adjuncts by well-trained lifeguards might facilitate in-water resuscitation. 55,56…”

Section: Basic Life Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All other studies were crossover trials that evaluated the capacity of lifeguards 53–56 and laypeople 54 to perform in-water resuscitation while simulating a water rescue with a manikin. In-water resuscitation was technically difficult and physically demanding, particularly in open water.…”

Section: Basic Life Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In-water resuscitation was technically difficult and physically demanding, particularly in open water. Some trained lifeguards 55 and laypeople 54 were unable to complete the rescue. In-water resuscitation increased rescue time and the number of submersions and aspiration of water by the manikin.…”

Section: Basic Life Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…52 The other 4 studies were manikin studies conducted in swimming pools 53,54 and open water. 55,56 The clinical study reported survival status and neurological outcome of 19 patients who received in-water resuscitation compared with 27 patients who did not. 52 The in-water resuscitation protocol recommended performing up to 1 minute of ventilation before attempting to bring the unconscious and not-breathing patient to the shore.…”

Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The rate of survival at hospital discharge was higher in the in-water resuscitation group (87.5% versus 25%; P<0.005), as was favorable neurological outcome (52.6% versus 7.4%; P<0.001). 52 All other studies were crossover trials that evaluated the capacity of lifeguards [53][54][55][56] and laypeople 54 to perform in-water resuscitation while simulating a water rescue with a manikin. In-water resuscitation was technically difficult and physically demanding, particularly in open water.…”

Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group

Wyckoff¹,

Singletary²,

Soar³

et al. 2022

Circulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

show abstract

Section: Basic Life Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Basic Life Supportmentioning

confidence: 99%