2016
DOI: 10.1049/cje.2016.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Sensor Deployment Method Based on Image Processing and Wavelet Transform to Optimize the Surface Coverage in WSNs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison algorithms in the experiment are GWO, DEA (differential evolution algorithm) and ABC-DSS (artificial bee colony algorithm with dynamic search strategy), and their information is shown in Table 12. The parameters of the comparison algorithms are consistent with those in the literature [28], [29], [31]. It should be noted that in DEA, mutation factor F = 0.9 and cross-factor CR = 0.1.…”
Section: B Experiments 2: 3d Sensor Simulation Experiments and Analysissupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison algorithms in the experiment are GWO, DEA (differential evolution algorithm) and ABC-DSS (artificial bee colony algorithm with dynamic search strategy), and their information is shown in Table 12. The parameters of the comparison algorithms are consistent with those in the literature [28], [29], [31]. It should be noted that in DEA, mutation factor F = 0.9 and cross-factor CR = 0.1.…”
Section: B Experiments 2: 3d Sensor Simulation Experiments and Analysissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, the situation of blind spots is not considered in this article, and the deployment method is slow to deploy. Yang et al [28] proposed an ABC-DSS (artificial bee colony algorithm with dynamic search strategy) to deploy 3D surfaces with limited sensor nodes. This algorithm matches the sensor deployment problems on 3D surface well.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensing range of s j is a reference distance r s from which we can pronounce on the coverage of p i by s j in function of their distance d(p i , s j ) [5], [6], [7], [8]. The influence of this factor on C(p i , s j ), modeled by the function [9], [10], [7], where C(p i , s j ) degrades with respect to d(p i , s j ), and it becomes null when the point p i is outside the sensing range of s j ; (iii) Hybrid impact [11], [12], [13], by considering that s j has two sensing ranges, the first is "with certitude", noted r 1 , and the second is "without certitude", noted r 2 , where r 2 > r 1 . Thus, C(p i , s j ) is constant with respect to d(p i , s j ), as long as p i is in the sensing range "with certitude" of s j ; it is null when p i is outside the sensing range "without certitude" of s j , and it degrades with [14], [6], [15], which means that…”
Section: A Impact Of the Sns Sensing Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26], [20], [18], [19], [4], [ be discontinuous, such as the matrix model or continuous, such as the mathematical and the TIN (Triangulated Irregular Network) models. In the matrix model, Cov(A, N ) represents the rate of points of E covered by the N SNs [11], [12], [15], [18], considering that these points have the same level [11], [12], [13], [15], [18] or different levels [10] of importance. Thus, Cov(A, N ) is given by Eq.…”
Section: Roi Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%