2021
DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2021.1939426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel service level agreement model using blockchain and smart contract for cloud manufacturing in industry 4.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, blockchain itself is ineffective for the design and development of data-intensive applications, which require huge computational power to mine and validate the blockchain [17][18][19]. Thus, the integration of blockchain and IoT, namely blockchain-IoT (BIoT), has become one of the current active research areas to overcome the challenges on storage capacity, scalability, security and data privacy in information systems [20]. Considering the BIoT, the interactions between blockchain and IoT can be classified into three types, namely (i) all IoT nodes have interacted with blockchain independently, (ii) some IoT nodes have interacted with blockchain and other IoT nodes, and (iii) some IoT nodes have interacted with blockchain, other IoT nodes, and cloud/fog/edge nodes.…”
Section: Blockchain and The Internet Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, blockchain itself is ineffective for the design and development of data-intensive applications, which require huge computational power to mine and validate the blockchain [17][18][19]. Thus, the integration of blockchain and IoT, namely blockchain-IoT (BIoT), has become one of the current active research areas to overcome the challenges on storage capacity, scalability, security and data privacy in information systems [20]. Considering the BIoT, the interactions between blockchain and IoT can be classified into three types, namely (i) all IoT nodes have interacted with blockchain independently, (ii) some IoT nodes have interacted with blockchain and other IoT nodes, and (iii) some IoT nodes have interacted with blockchain, other IoT nodes, and cloud/fog/edge nodes.…”
Section: Blockchain and The Internet Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, D'Angelo et al [12] review the challenges and requirements for enforcing accountability in Cloud infrastructures where violations of SLAs constitute an important and usual phenomenon and argue that smart contracts and blockchain technologies seem to establish a key contribution toward accountable Clouds. Finally, W. Tan et al [13] present a novel performant and secure SLA model where trust among the IaaS, their clientele and the third-party monitoring entities are addressed through blockchain. The authors argue that there is no effective supervision mechanism for the third-party that is responsible for the monitoring and no efficient compensation mechanism on SLA violation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative assessment table (Table 1) includes the relationships of the state-of-the-art literature presented throughout this section and supplements the analysis of the key differences and additions with regards to the proposed solution. Blockchain SLA Monitoring SLA Self-Assessment Tan et al [13] Performant SLA Cloud IaaS Supervision Without On-chain Intermediaries…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research focuses on SLAs in cloud service provisioning, which is an integral part of digitalization in industry and manufacturing. Traditional cloud service management approaches face problems such as poor management and auditing of SLAs, dependence on (untrusted) third-party monitoring, and the dominant position of the service provider compared with the service customer [ 16 ]. Blockchain-based approaches can be more efficient than the current SLA management because of increased transparency, automated SLA enforcement and conflict resolution, and decentralized audited decision making [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%