2012
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel significance score for gene selection and ranking

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
253
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
253
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene expression analysis was performed by the multifactor model of the R package for differential expression analysis for sequence count data (51). Effects of humanized Foxp2 were summarized by the π-value that multiplies the magnitude and significance of genotype effect (52). This ranking was used for the Wilcoxon rank test implemented in FUNC (https://func.eva.mpg.de/) (53) to identify enriched Gene Ontology categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression analysis was performed by the multifactor model of the R package for differential expression analysis for sequence count data (51). Effects of humanized Foxp2 were summarized by the π-value that multiplies the magnitude and significance of genotype effect (52). This ranking was used for the Wilcoxon rank test implemented in FUNC (https://func.eva.mpg.de/) (53) to identify enriched Gene Ontology categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathway analysis involving genes important in dairy cattle production was a part of the study by Cochran et al (2013). Xiao et al (2014) used the real data set to generate background data for hypothesis testing, which is conceptually similar to our approach; however, it was based on data resampling, not on permutation. In agreement with our study, but in the context of gene expression analysis, Zhe et al (2013) and Verbanck et al (2013) indicate that the incorporation of pathway information, which represents biologically functional groups of genes, improves interpretability of results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70; P < 0.05 for significant DEGs); and (c) average intensity from at least 1 group of greater than 4 (log 2 ). Additional P values for other differential gene expression assessments were also obtained, including rank-sum test and pi value, a unique statistic that combines the t test's P value and fold change (71). Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) was performed by applying a MDS algorithm to the gene expression data to visualize the relationship (Pearson coefficient) between samples (72).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%