2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8594403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Soft Elbow Exosuit to Supplement Bicep Lifting Capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth highlighting that the muscular activity index results of this work were obtained with a procedure fundamentally different from the one used in other comparable studies (e.g., Simpson et al, 2017 ; Thalman et al, 2018 ): the admittance controller that we designed allowed the suit to continuously move in concert with its wearer while delivering an assistive torque. The other studies listed here lacked an intention–detection strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting that the muscular activity index results of this work were obtained with a procedure fundamentally different from the one used in other comparable studies (e.g., Simpson et al, 2017 ; Thalman et al, 2018 ): the admittance controller that we designed allowed the suit to continuously move in concert with its wearer while delivering an assistive torque. The other studies listed here lacked an intention–detection strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of using SWRs for UB assistance avoid placing heavy components or restricting joint alignments on the user’s arms or torso. Many of these SWRs for the UB are outlined in the following sections to discuss several types of assistance in more detail.
Figure 5.A brief survey of recent soft wearable robot (SWR) technologies for each of the following upper body joints: (a) A soft robotic hand developed at Harvard University at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering (Cappello et al 2018b), (b) a soft assistive device for the wrist made from fabric materials (Realmuto and Sanger 2019), (c) a soft elbow exosuit designed at Arizona State University (Thalman et al 2018), (d) shoulder-assistive device also from Harvard University at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering (O’Neill et al 2017), (e) trunk orthosis from the Reconfigurable Robotics Lab at Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (Robertson and Paik 2016), and (f) an upper body device that assists multiple joints via cable-driven actuation (Lessard 2018).
…”
Section: Upper Body Soft Assistive Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of textiles and elastomers, intrinsically complying with the complex human biomechanics, has allowed a substantial leap in the rendering of Human-Robot interaction (HRI): explicitly in contrast with rigid exoskeletons, exosuits do not have the disadvantage of kinematic incompatibility with the human joints and they are designed with negligible distal mass on human limbs. These characteristics have allowed researchers and developers to reduce the energy cost of human walking and running (Kim et al, 2020 ) and support the upper limbs against gravity in both unimpaired users (Thalman et al, 2018 ) and neurological patients (O'Neill et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intention detection strategies for exosuits that support the upper limbs are often limited to a manual input and open loop command, operated by an assistant or by the user her/himself: for example, for soft devices driven by a Pneumatic Interference Actuator (PIA) for shoulder support as described by O'Neill et al ( 2020 ). A similar strategy was chosen by Simpson et al ( 2020 ) for supporting shoulder abduction or by Thalman et al ( 2018 ), to assist elbow flexion. While this method is extremely practical and robust, at the same time it lacks versatility and relies on an additional, functional “hand” which must intervene in order to control a contralateral assistive device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%