2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel SPH method for the solution of Dual-Phase-Lag model with temperature-jump boundary condition in nanoscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saghatchi and Ghazanfarian [165] and Ghazanfarian et al [166] presented a novel SPH method for the solution of the dual-phase-lag non-Fourier model concerning nanoscale geometry. They also presented a SPH technique for applying the Robintype temperature jump boundary condition.…”
Section: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saghatchi and Ghazanfarian [165] and Ghazanfarian et al [166] presented a novel SPH method for the solution of the dual-phase-lag non-Fourier model concerning nanoscale geometry. They also presented a SPH technique for applying the Robintype temperature jump boundary condition.…”
Section: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the alternative is to use a mesh-free method such as the SPH scheme. The SPH method is a mesh-free Lagrangian particle-based method and is proved to be applicable for the simulation of multidimensional complex geometries, deformable materials or moving boundaries [37], non-Fourier nanoscale applications [38], and solving the Poisson's problem [39].…”
Section: Numerical Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because of the no-slip boundary condition, which is only satised at a macroscopic scale, in which the length scale of the problem is much larger than the mean free path of the molecules. This effect is described by the Knudsen number (Kn), which can be dened as 55 Kn ¼ l/L, where l is the molecular mean free path and L is the characteristic length scale, which in this study is equal to the diameter of the nanotubes. The deviation of the HP calculation and MD simulation is also due to the molecular interactions, which are not important in the macroscale continuum assumption.…”
Section: Water Conductionmentioning
confidence: 99%