2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1ja00229e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel strategy for direct elemental determination using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: fluence calibration

Abstract: Quantitative analysis requires several efforts to obtain an adequate calibration method to overcome matrix effects employing direct solid analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). To this end, in this study,...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the signal intensity of the observed LIBS spectral line may be influenced by several factors: (i) the intrinsic property of an atom, which can be described in terms of the transition probability ( A nm ); 21 (ii) the intrinsic laser properties (such as the wavelength, repetition rate, and power density focused on the sample surface), recorded as φ ; (iii) the spectrometer parameters (such as delay time and gate width), recorded as σ ; (iv) the different physical characteristics of the sample (such as the particle size distribution, microhomogeneity, and water content), recorded as ψ . 22 Therefore, I θ can be described as I θ = f ( A nm , φ , σ , ψ )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the signal intensity of the observed LIBS spectral line may be influenced by several factors: (i) the intrinsic property of an atom, which can be described in terms of the transition probability ( A nm ); 21 (ii) the intrinsic laser properties (such as the wavelength, repetition rate, and power density focused on the sample surface), recorded as φ ; (iii) the spectrometer parameters (such as delay time and gate width), recorded as σ ; (iv) the different physical characteristics of the sample (such as the particle size distribution, microhomogeneity, and water content), recorded as ψ . 22 Therefore, I θ can be described as I θ = f ( A nm , φ , σ , ψ )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%