2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2016.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel surface mesh deformation method for handling wing-fuselage intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mario Jaime Martin-Burgos et al [28] recognizes the inadequacies in present day simulation softwares to adapt the computational grid upon encountering deformation or irregularities in the surface being computed for, requiring them to reconstruct the mesh at every step. These shortcomings in the simulations normally cluster around interstices of components with varying topologies like fuselage-wings or intersections of moving parts.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Aircraft Fuselagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mario Jaime Martin-Burgos et al [28] recognizes the inadequacies in present day simulation softwares to adapt the computational grid upon encountering deformation or irregularities in the surface being computed for, requiring them to reconstruct the mesh at every step. These shortcomings in the simulations normally cluster around interstices of components with varying topologies like fuselage-wings or intersections of moving parts.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Aircraft Fuselagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although using grid deformation methods would ensure that the grid topology remains the same, such an approach may severely deteriorate the mesh quality through skewness of the cells when deformations are significant. Moreover, Martin-Burgos et al (2017) notes that there are still deficiencies of mesh deformation methods when used in areas with moving intersections. In this case, the tips where the wings meet and join form such an intersection, and hence, regenerating the mesh was deemed as a more appropriate approach.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%