2018
DOI: 10.5829/ije.2018.31.11b.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Sustainable Closed-loop Supply Chain Network Design by Considering Routing and Quality of Products

Abstract: A B S T R A C TOne of the strategic decisions that can be made in supply chain is designing its network which has high impact on costs, and satisfaction level of customers. This paper focuses on designing a distribution network including determining the number and location of facilities, how to allocate the customers in network, and also determining the extent of carrying different products from different origins to different destinations; in this distribution network, according to the existing restrictions, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Darbari et al (2019) started out with the AHP-TOPSIS method to determine the sustainability criteria relevant to stakeholders and then use the MILP with weighted fuzzy goal programming to optimise for the objectives identified through the MCDM method. In contrast, the results of a mixed integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model (Mirmohammadi and Sahraeian, 2018) and a MILP (Taleizadeh et al, 2019) have three objectives according to which they optimise first, and only in a second step do they employ the TOPSIS method and fuzzy AHP method respectively to identify the best option of the Pareto-optimal results. Another approach to evaluate Pareto-optimal solutions is the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method (Bal and Satoglu, 2019).…”
Section: Decision-supporting Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Darbari et al (2019) started out with the AHP-TOPSIS method to determine the sustainability criteria relevant to stakeholders and then use the MILP with weighted fuzzy goal programming to optimise for the objectives identified through the MCDM method. In contrast, the results of a mixed integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model (Mirmohammadi and Sahraeian, 2018) and a MILP (Taleizadeh et al, 2019) have three objectives according to which they optimise first, and only in a second step do they employ the TOPSIS method and fuzzy AHP method respectively to identify the best option of the Pareto-optimal results. Another approach to evaluate Pareto-optimal solutions is the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method (Bal and Satoglu, 2019).…”
Section: Decision-supporting Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018); Govindan et al. (2016b); Mirmohammadi & Sahraeian (2018); Pishvaee et al. (2014); Rahimi et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints (18) and (19) ensure that the total demand of customers may not be met in the direct flow, and that all returned products will be collected from customer centers in the reverse flow.…”
Section: 1 Risk Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue causes many problems when using traditional supply [11]. For example, it is very difficult to find variable production prices in a situation where the price of raw materials fluctuates [18]. But The fuzzy logic can greatly help decision makers to deal with uncertainty [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%