2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel tantalum-containing bioglass. Part II. Development of a bioadhesive for sternal fixation and repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Control in the current study showed a higher maximum compressive strength at Day 30 (~30 MPa) compared with that in a similar study published by Alhalawani et al (Alhalawani et al, 2017) (~18 MPa) using a similar glass composition and the same P:L ratio (TA2); likely due to the physicality of the glass phase (the glass particles in this study were sieved to ≤20 μm, whereas in (Alhalawani et al, 2017) they were ≤45 μm, the smaller particle size resulting in a greater surface area available for reaction, leading to a faster setting and increasing strength. From the BFS results, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CaSO 4 does not significantly affect BFS, but increases compressive strength.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Control in the current study showed a higher maximum compressive strength at Day 30 (~30 MPa) compared with that in a similar study published by Alhalawani et al (Alhalawani et al, 2017) (~18 MPa) using a similar glass composition and the same P:L ratio (TA2); likely due to the physicality of the glass phase (the glass particles in this study were sieved to ≤20 μm, whereas in (Alhalawani et al, 2017) they were ≤45 μm, the smaller particle size resulting in a greater surface area available for reaction, leading to a faster setting and increasing strength. From the BFS results, it can be concluded that the incorporation of CaSO 4 does not significantly affect BFS, but increases compressive strength.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, the bioactive glass systems showed strong antibacterial and antifungal activity against both Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria. Cytotoxicity results indicated that the resultant GPC is non‐toxic to cells (Alhalawani et al, 2017; Alhalawani & Towler, 2017). The bioactive glass used for this study was prepared by a glass manufacturer (Mo‐Sci, Rolla, MO) using specified fraction (Table 1) according to the paper published by Alhalawani and Towler (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This sudden change, when going from the 650°C of calcination to room temperature, could cause nanoscale defects in the structure. With bulk BGs, these nanoscale defects are sufficient to significantly increase the ion solubility of the glasses in aqueous medium . Therefore, in MBGs, where the channels are just an order of magnitude greater than the defect size, the effect of nanoscale defects is more prominent and causes breaks in the channel structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioactive glasses can be formulated to deliver therapeutic ions that may bond with bone, initiate remineralization, and provide antibacterial effects [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. 45S5 Bioglass ® was the first inorganic material designed to bond with bone which did not form scar tissue upon implantation in rat femurs [ 14 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%