2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-016-1475-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation

Abstract: Microbubbles are used as ultrasound contrast agents, which enhance ultrasound imaging techniques. In addition, microbubbles currently show promise in disease therapeutics. Microfluidic devices have increased the ability to produce microbubbles with precise size, and high monodispersity compared to microbubbles created using traditional methods. This paper will review several variations in microfluidic device structures used to produce microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents. Microfluidic device structures i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CEUS is a functional imaging technique that provides important diagnostic information and has become an alternative method of enhanced computed tomography and other imaging methods 22 . In combination with SonoVue, CEUS has shown high performance in detecting both large and small vascularities 8,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEUS is a functional imaging technique that provides important diagnostic information and has become an alternative method of enhanced computed tomography and other imaging methods 22 . In combination with SonoVue, CEUS has shown high performance in detecting both large and small vascularities 8,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the specific microchannel and microintegral components which is coupled with specific geometries, T-junction microfluidic devices can provide highly accurate monodisperse samples with uniform shell thickness and composition. Whereas a downfall with sonication is that it creates uncontrolled shear that can result in MBs with differing shell thickness, a factor which could also account for the stiffer MBs seen in the present study (50). Earlier AFM work assessing stiffness values has shown mixed results when trying to establish a general relationship between MB diameter and MB stiffness; with some studies showing an exponential decay relationship between stiffness and MB-diameter, such as the findings from McKendry et al and Chen et al (49,51).…”
Section: Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Fabricating microfluidic molds with such small orifices is expensive and requires high-resolution photolithography. (15) This makes a simple and low-cost alternative microfluidic approach that produces small microbubbles highly desirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%