2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel textual data augmentation method for identifying comparative text from user-generated content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, although #1 in Table 4 lacks a keyword, it implies comparative information. On the other hand, CSR and SVM generally predict non-comparative text including selected keywords or rules as comparative text [53], such as the example #2 in Table 4. While deep learning-based methods have the ability to correctly identify them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although #1 in Table 4 lacks a keyword, it implies comparative information. On the other hand, CSR and SVM generally predict non-comparative text including selected keywords or rules as comparative text [53], such as the example #2 in Table 4. While deep learning-based methods have the ability to correctly identify them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shorten and Khoshgoftaar et al [25] used a deletion method with word lists and randomized deletion probabilities, to randomly delete some words in a sentence by deactivating the word list and preset probability. However, these methods are based on simple rules or dictionaries, which lack a deep understanding of the text and make it difficult to provide additional effective information to assist image classification [26]. Other approaches try different strategies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%