“…MOFs offer the potential for extensive topological and functional control through judicious choice of the organic linker. The use of specific functional groups may influence which metals can be used, such as Zn 2+ with carboxylate groups , or Cu 2+ with pyridyl groups. − Further, the geometry of the organic component may influence the overall topology: more flexible aliphatic linkers have been shown to produce more dense structures, − whereas rigid, conjugated species may promote more open and robust topologies. ,,− An exception to this allows for construction of open frameworks with a flexible ligand through selection of a metal center with a high coordination sphere, such as with the lanthanides and actinides. ,,− An advantage of such a selection is that the flexibility of the ligand may aid in maintaining an open framework upon evacuation of any guest molecules present in the pores. , These few examples are by no means an exhaustive listing of the vast diversity of MOF materials but rather are representative of the philosophy of the construction of inorganic/organic hybrid frameworks. Readers are encouraged to explore more thorough reviews ,,,, to appreciate the breadth of compounds in these systems.…”