2018
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel titanium sapphire picosecond‐domain laser safely and effectively removes purple, blue, and green tattoo inks

Abstract: BackgroundGreen, blue, and purple tattoo pigments are often the colors most resistant to laser removal. Recently, the first ever production picosecond‐domain laser with a 785 nm wavelength was developed to improve the rate of clearance of green, blue, and purple tattoo inks.MethodsTwenty‐two tattoos from 15 subjects with skin phototypes II–IV were enrolled in the study. A total of four treatments were administered using a single 785 nm picosecond‐domain laser wavelength. Blinded assessment of digital, cross‐po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again, the picosecond pulse significantly outperformed the nanosecond pulse. Currently, lasers with true picosecond pulse durations have been developed at wavelengths of 532, 730, 755, 785, and 1064 nm and have all been reported as effective at clearing almost every color of tattoo ink as well as paradoxical darkening of tattoo [77,[79][80][81][82]85,96]. A systematic review was published in 2016 analyzing the safety and efficacy of picosecond lasers for tattoo removal, and the general consensus is that they work very well and have a high degree of safety and tolerability [97,98].…”
Section: Tattoo Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, the picosecond pulse significantly outperformed the nanosecond pulse. Currently, lasers with true picosecond pulse durations have been developed at wavelengths of 532, 730, 755, 785, and 1064 nm and have all been reported as effective at clearing almost every color of tattoo ink as well as paradoxical darkening of tattoo [77,[79][80][81][82]85,96]. A systematic review was published in 2016 analyzing the safety and efficacy of picosecond lasers for tattoo removal, and the general consensus is that they work very well and have a high degree of safety and tolerability [97,98].…”
Section: Tattoo Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary 1,064 nm wavelength is optimized for removing black ink and would be used for treating it by most laser operators; although, in the current study the 730 nm laser was effective at removing black ink as well, removing on average 70% of black pigment in four treatments as evaluated by blinded scoring of cross‐polarized images. Previously we reported on a Ti:sapphire 785 nm, 300 picoseconds pulse duration, laser‐pumped‐laser handpiece used with the same picosecond‐domain, 1,064 nm laser system used in the current study [17]. The current laser system emits at a significantly shorter wavelength, 730 nm, and would be expected to be more effective at removing brown spots such as freckles and lentigenes at equivalent fluences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The newest additions to the armamentarium aimed at removing unwanted tattoos are the commercial picoseconddomain lasers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The first of these lasers was an alexandrite laser having a pulse duration of approximately 0.5 nanoseconds [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, due to short pulse width and low energy density, the tissue damage around the target base is minimized using a picosecond laser, which improves the curative effect and reduces the adverse reactions [ 4 ]. The picosecond laser has distinct advantages in eliminating tattoos, especially stubborn tattoos and intractable yellow tattoos [ 5 7 ]. Also, the picosecond laser has good performance in light aging treatment [ 8 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%