2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel triaxial optoelectronic based dynamometer for machining processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The papers mentioned previously [59][60][61] state the importance for a cost-efficient alternative to the force sensing systems. Dynamometers provide mostly accurate cutting force measurements, that can be obtained very quickly when compared to the numerical-analytical methods, which, in turn, enables the faster analysis/optimization of a machining process.…”
Section: Creation Of New Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The papers mentioned previously [59][60][61] state the importance for a cost-efficient alternative to the force sensing systems. Dynamometers provide mostly accurate cutting force measurements, that can be obtained very quickly when compared to the numerical-analytical methods, which, in turn, enables the faster analysis/optimization of a machining process.…”
Section: Creation Of New Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some recent developments on dynamometer types, such as a novel triaxial optoelectronic-based dynamometer presented in the Subasi’s work [ 59 ], in which the authors describe the development of a compact and triaxial dynamometer which uses photo-interrupters. This dynamometer can detect forces in three orthogonal dimensions and presented as an alternative to current dynamometers, being a compact and relatively low-cost solution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, studies are presented concerning the design of dynamometers for milling operations (Korkut, 2003;Rizal et al, 2015;Subasi et al, 2018). Also, analytical finite element methods for computing thrust force and torque are used by Strenkowski et al (2004), Yang and Sun (2009), and Gok et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sensitivity issues such as those affecting dynamometers based on strain gauges [ 5 ], capacitance sensors [ 6 ], optical sensors [ 7 , 8 , 9 ] and other sensors requiring large structural deformations at the inspected point in order to achieve a satisfactory signal to noise ratio; this is typically obtained by weakening the machining system, thus reducing the resonance frequency;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• sensitivity issues such as those affecting dynamometers based on strain gauges [5], capacitance sensors [6], optical sensors [7][8][9] and other sensors requiring large structural deformations at the inspected point in order to achieve a satisfactory signal to noise ratio; this is typically obtained by weakening the machining system, thus reducing the resonance frequency; • load effects such as those introduced by rotating dynamometers [10,11] that may drastically reduce the first resonance frequency of the machine tool spindle (below 500 Hz) with respect to the unaltered configuration where no sensor (thus neither additional modal mass nor additional flexibility) is integrated into the machining system; and • dynamic inertial disturbances deriving from the undesired but unavoidable oscillations of the modal mass placed in front of the piezoelectric load cells in case of plateform dynamometers; by so doing, even low-frequency vibration modes of the machine tool table where the dynamometer is clamped may cause undesired force fluctuations that cannot be avoided, as explained in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%