2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel unified approach to invariance conditions for a linear dynamical system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since int(P) is an open set, we have that the statement is true for x k ∈ int(P). For x k ∈ ∂ P, by Nagumo's Theorem, see e.g., Horváth et al (2013); Nagumo (1942), the statement is also true.…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since int(P) is an open set, we have that the statement is true for x k ∈ int(P). For x k ∈ ∂ P, by Nagumo's Theorem, see e.g., Horváth et al (2013); Nagumo (1942), the statement is also true.…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Proof. According to Horváth et al (2013), we have that E is an invariant set for the discrete and continuous systems if and only if A T QA − Q 0 and A T Q + QA 0, respectively. Then by Lemma 4.2, we have thatτ = ∞.…”
Section: Uniform Steplength Threshold For Linear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observe that parameter β presented in Corollary 3.8 can be eliminated. In fact, one can show that [11].…”
Section: Remark 32 Consider the Following M Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the system in Theorem 3.1 is a linear dynamical system, then we have the following corollary, which is an invariance condition of polyhedral sets for linear systems. Note that Corollary 3.3 can also be referred to [11]. An alternative proof for Corollary 3.3, using optimality conditions is presented in the Appendix.…”
Section: Remark 32 Consider the Following M Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%