2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel Vip3Aa16-Cry1Ac chimera toxin: Enhancement of toxicity against Ephestia kuehniella, structural study and molecular docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main reasons for this is the lack of a high-resolution three-dimensional structure, which significantly impedes detailed molecular level functional and mechanistic studies and thus limits the development of their insecticidal potential. Accordingly, many groups have made great efforts to obtain or predict the atomic structure of Vip3A 21, 27, 28, 32, 33 . However, high-resolution crystal structure of Vip3 toxin family is still missing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main reasons for this is the lack of a high-resolution three-dimensional structure, which significantly impedes detailed molecular level functional and mechanistic studies and thus limits the development of their insecticidal potential. Accordingly, many groups have made great efforts to obtain or predict the atomic structure of Vip3A 21, 27, 28, 32, 33 . However, high-resolution crystal structure of Vip3 toxin family is still missing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scavenger receptor class C like protein (Sf-SR-C) and the fibroblast growth factor receptor (Fgfr) have been reported as potential receptors for Vip3A 13, 14 . However, although some in silico modeling efforts and low resolution cryo-EM structures have attempted to obtain structural insight for these toxins, the atomic structure of Vip3A is still not available, which makes it difficult to reveal the relationship between their structure and function 27, 28, 32, 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also detected bands smaller than 19 kDa by stopping the electrophoresis before they ran out of the gel. [11] for Vip3Aa (at residues 313, 532, and 667, respectively). The agreement between the domain limits proposed by us with some of those defined by in silico modelling supports the predictive value of the tryptic fragments approach to unravel structural domains of the Vip3A proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Vip3Af, five structural domains were proposed [4], with domain 1 spanning from the N-terminus to residue 188, domain 2 from residue 189 to 272, domain 3 from 273 to 542, domain 4 from 543 to 715, and domain 5 from 716 to the end. For Vip3Aa16, three domains were proposed, though domain 1 was further subdivided into three domains [11]: subdomain 1.1 spanned from the N-terminus to residue 313, subdomain 1.2.1 from 314 to 441, subdomain 1.2.2 from 442 to 532, domain 2 from 533 to 667, and domain 3 from 668 to the end. Given the high sequence similarity between the two proteins (92.7%), the discrepancy between them regarding the predicted regions spanned by the domains likely reflects inaccuracies of the modelling programs used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the structure of Vip3A toxin has not been solved. Its structural information has been derived only by in-silico modeling [14,15], though the structure of the Vip3B was recently reported [16]. Studies on proteolytic activation of Vip3A proteins have shown that by a proteolytical process Vip3A protoxins are cleaved to become several major fragments, generally including fragments of 62-66 kDa, 45 kDa, 33 kDa and 19-22 kDa [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%