2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04510.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel weighting method for satellite magnetic data and a new global magnetic field model

Abstract: S U M M A R YA new data weighting scheme is introduced for satellite geomagnetic survey data. Data weights for individual satellite samples at 20-s spacing are derived from two 'noise' (or unmodelled signal) estimators for the sample. First, the standard deviation along the 20 s of satellite track, centred on each sample, is computed as a measure of local magnetic activity. Second a larger-scale noise estimator is defined in terms of a 'local area vector activity' (LAVA) index for the sample. This is derived f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modelling technique and data selection closely follow those previously described by Olsen et al (2014). CHAOS-5 is similar to the IGRF parent models produced by a number of other teams (for example Maus et al 2010;Rother et al 2013;Thomson et al 2010) in not explicitly modelling the ionospheric field, in contrast to the more sophisticated comprehensive modelling approach (Sabaka et al 2015;Thébault et al 2015). Instead, data selection for CHAOS-5 is limited to dark-region data from geomagnetically quiet times (when ionospheric currents are weak, at least at non-polar latitudes), in an effort to isolate as best as possible the field of internal origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The modelling technique and data selection closely follow those previously described by Olsen et al (2014). CHAOS-5 is similar to the IGRF parent models produced by a number of other teams (for example Maus et al 2010;Rother et al 2013;Thomson et al 2010) in not explicitly modelling the ionospheric field, in contrast to the more sophisticated comprehensive modelling approach (Sabaka et al 2015;Thébault et al 2015). Instead, data selection for CHAOS-5 is limited to dark-region data from geomagnetically quiet times (when ionospheric currents are weak, at least at non-polar latitudes), in an effort to isolate as best as possible the field of internal origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The selected satellite data were individually weighted using two 'noise' estimators which we briefly outline here (for a detailed description, see Thomson et al (2010)). Firstly, we use a measure of local magnetic activity derived from the standard deviation (SD) along short segments (20 samples, approximately 150 km) of satellite track.…”
Section: Sw_oper_magc_lr_1b_20140401t000000_20140401t235959_0301_mdr_mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the launch of the Ørsted satellite (Olsen et al, 2000) in 1999, vector magnetic data from dedicated magnetic field missions have greatly improved models of the geomagnetic field and with it, our understanding of the behaviour of the various physical sources. A number of groups have produced main field models of the field generated by the internal sources (typically consisting of core, crust, (quasi-)steady ocean flow and the induced part from the ionosphere and magnetosphere) including the CHAOS (Olsen et al, 2006(Olsen et al, , 2009, GRIMM (Lesur et al, 2008(Lesur et al, , 2010 and MEME (Thomson et al, 2010;Hamilton et al, 2010) series of models. In addition, the quinquennial releases of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) (Finlay et al, 2010b;Thébault et al, 2015b) and World Magnetic Model (WMM) (Maus et al, 2010;Chulliat et al, 2015) benefited from the voluminous satellite dataset and the ground observatory network (Macmillan and Olsen, 2013), as well as advances in theoretical and numerical techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%