We have performed X-inactivation and sequence analyses on 350 kb of sequence from human Xp11.2, a region shown previously to contain a cluster of genes that escape X inactivation, and we compared this region with the region of conserved synteny in mouse. We identified several new transcripts from this region in human and in mouse, which defined the full extent of the domain escaping X inactivation in both species. In human, escape from X inactivation involves an uninterrupted 235-kb domain of multiple genes. Despite highly conserved gene content and order between the two species, Smcx is the only mouse gene from the conserved segment that escapes inactivation. As repetitive sequences are believed to facilitate spreading of X inactivation along the chromosome, we compared the repetitive sequence composition of this region between the two species. We found that long terminal repeats (LTRs) were decreased in the human domain of escape, but not in the majority of the conserved mouse region adjacent to Smcx in which genes were subject to X inactivation, suggesting that these repeats might be excluded from escape domains to prevent spreading of silencing. Our findings indicate that genomic context, as well as gene-specific regulatory elements, interact to determine expression of a gene from the inactive X-chromosome.[Supplemental material is available online at www.genome.org. The sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank under accession no. AY451401. The following individuals kindly provided reagents, samples, or unpublished information as indicated in the paper: G. Filippova and M. Delbridge.]X inactivation is a unique form of gene regulation resulting in the transcriptional silencing of most genes on one X-chromosome in each somatic cell of mammalian females. Despite the chromosome-wide nature of this phenomenon, 10% to 20% of genes on the human X-chromosome have been found to escape inactivation . Many epigenetic and functional features have been identified that distinguish genes subject to inactivation from those that escape inactivation, such as differences in replication timing, CpG island methylation, and histone modifications (for review, see Disteche et al. 2002;Brown and Greally 2003), yet the mechanisms that underlie the phenomenon of escape remain poorly understood. X inactivation is initiated by the XIST gene, followed by spreading of silencing along the X-chromosome, and maintenance of the inactive state with its associated epigenetic changes (Plath et al. 2002). Escape from inactivation could be caused by a lack of initial silencing at the onset of inactivation that occurs early in development. Alternatively, genes that escape may be initially silenced, but may fail to maintain the inactive state. Our studies that have followed expression of Smcx through the course of mouse development indicate that escape appears to be caused by failure to maintain the inactive state (Lingenfelter et al. 1998).The factors that are responsible for escape from X inactivation may reside at the level of...