1982
DOI: 10.2307/4114733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Numerical Analysis of the Eragrostideae (Gramineae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…due to its similar floral structure and free pericarps, but the author noted that T. advena differed from Sporobolus in having multiple florets per spikelet (as is found in Eragrostis). Phillips (1982) placed this species in Eragrostis, pointing out that the floral structure of T. advena fit her concept of Eragrostis and that free pericarps are found elsewhere in the genus. The Van den Borre and Watson (1997) analyses suggested that Acamptoclados, Diandrochloa, Neeragrostis, and Thellungia are closely related to Eragrostis, but because composite terminals were used, it is impossible to determine whether these genera are separate lineages or if they are better included within Eragrostis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…due to its similar floral structure and free pericarps, but the author noted that T. advena differed from Sporobolus in having multiple florets per spikelet (as is found in Eragrostis). Phillips (1982) placed this species in Eragrostis, pointing out that the floral structure of T. advena fit her concept of Eragrostis and that free pericarps are found elsewhere in the genus. The Van den Borre and Watson (1997) analyses suggested that Acamptoclados, Diandrochloa, Neeragrostis, and Thellungia are closely related to Eragrostis, but because composite terminals were used, it is impossible to determine whether these genera are separate lineages or if they are better included within Eragrostis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Acamptoclados, a monotypic genus (ϭ E. sessilispica) from the plains and prairies of North America, was separated from Eragrostis by Nash on the basis of its free pericarp and lack of secondary inflorescence branches (Small 1903). Phillips (1982) Watson and Dallwitz 1992). Phillips (1982) rejected this treatment, however, and included these species in Eragrostis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…La aplicación de técnicas numéricas multivariadas contribuye a reconocer grupos discretos de especímenes con mayor objetividad y los caracteres que permiten separarlos. Estas técnicas adquieren mucha importancia en grupos tan complicados como las gramíneas y han sido utilizados con buenos resultados en varios estudios taxonómicos (Phillips 1982, Giussani 2000, Flores 2003, Sebola & Balkwill 2009). Dentro de estas técnicas, el análisis de conglomerados y el de coordenadas principales, constituyen una buena herramienta para separar especies o grupos de especies similares morfológicamente (Randall & Hilu 1986, Henderson 2002, 2005, 2006, Cron et al 2007, así como para generar nuevas variables que puedan expresar la información contenida en el conjunto original de datos (Pla 1986, Crisci & López 1983.…”
unclassified