2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical and experimental analysis of multi-hole orifice in turbulent flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model k – ω BSL has been selected to conduct numerical flow tests in the work 25 where validation from several turbulent models for similar flow conditions was performed. The adopted model k – ω BSL, allows for using the benefits of the known calculation model k – ω in internal area of the boundary layer, whereas in the external part modelling is performed in model k – ε which, excluding boundary layer, does a much better job.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model k – ω BSL has been selected to conduct numerical flow tests in the work 25 where validation from several turbulent models for similar flow conditions was performed. The adopted model k – ω BSL, allows for using the benefits of the known calculation model k – ω in internal area of the boundary layer, whereas in the external part modelling is performed in model k – ε which, excluding boundary layer, does a much better job.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Equation (2), the frequency of oscillations depends on the density of the measured fluid. Similar to differential pressure flowmeter types [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], without knowing the fluid density no measurement can be carried out. This contrasts with vortex or ultrasonic flowmeters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such orifices, a single hole is replaced by several holes. Orifice solutions in which a single circular hole has been replaced by a single hole in the shape of a square, triangle, oval are also encountered in several studies [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%