2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10543-016-0615-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical approach for the Poisson equation in a planar domain with a small inclusion

Abstract: Abstract.We consider the Poisson equation in a domain with a small hole of size δ. We present a simple numerical method, based on an asymptotic analysis, which allows to approximate robustly the far field of the solution as δ goes to zero without meshing the small hole. We prove the stability of the scheme and provide error estimates. We end the paper with numerical experiments illustrating the efficiency of the technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, we mention the method of matching asymptotic expansions proposed by Il'in (see, e.g., [20,21,22]), the compound asymptotic expansion method of Maz'ya, Nazarov, and Plamenevskij [30] and of Kozlov, Maz'ya, and Movchan [23], and the mesoscale asymptotic approximations presented by Maz'ya, Movchan, and Nieves [29,31]. We also mention the works of Bonnaillie-Noël, Lacave, and Masmoudi [7], Chesnel and Claeys [8], and Dauge, Tordeux, and Vial [16]. Boundary value problems in domains with moderately close small holes have been analyzed by means of multiple scale asymptotic expansions by Bonnaillie-Noël, Dambrine, Tordeux, and Vial [5,6], Bonnaillie-Noël and Dambrine [3], and Bonnaillie-Noël, Dambrine, and Lacave [4].…”
Section: Methodology: the Functional Analytic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, we mention the method of matching asymptotic expansions proposed by Il'in (see, e.g., [20,21,22]), the compound asymptotic expansion method of Maz'ya, Nazarov, and Plamenevskij [30] and of Kozlov, Maz'ya, and Movchan [23], and the mesoscale asymptotic approximations presented by Maz'ya, Movchan, and Nieves [29,31]. We also mention the works of Bonnaillie-Noël, Lacave, and Masmoudi [7], Chesnel and Claeys [8], and Dauge, Tordeux, and Vial [16]. Boundary value problems in domains with moderately close small holes have been analyzed by means of multiple scale asymptotic expansions by Bonnaillie-Noël, Dambrine, Tordeux, and Vial [5,6], Bonnaillie-Noël and Dambrine [3], and Bonnaillie-Noël, Dambrine, and Lacave [4].…”
Section: Methodology: the Functional Analytic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eshelby tensor for an elliptical inclusion B in plane strain can be found from (24) by considering the limiting case of a 3D ellipsoidal inclusion infinitely elongated in the x 3 direction. Assuming C to be isotropic, analytical evaluation of the 2D version of (24) yields the following explicit expressions for the nonzero Eshelby tensor components [10, Eq.…”
Section: The Plane Strain Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that R(a) = O(a 2 ) for not-too-small inclusion sizes (Log(a/L) ≥ −3.5); this is the expected theoretical behaviour of R(a) as a → 0, as the O(a) contribution to R(a) is expected to vanish [23,7] for all inhomogeneities with centrally-symmetric shape (such as ellipses). For smaller defects, the theoretical behavior of R(a) = O(a 2 ) (which accounts only for asymptotic approximation errors) is no longer observed due to FE discretization errors becoming comparatively significant (see [24] for an analysis of the interplay between asymptotic and FE errors for the Poisson equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that numerically, this approach is much more simpler to implement than computing each term of the other decomposition v δ = u 0 + λ(δ)u 1, δ . This idea of modifying the expansion of v δ to obtain something easy to compute was used in [9] for a Laplacian with a small Dirichlet obstacle. However, in the latter work, a different decomposition was employed.…”
Section: An Approximate Model For the Far Field Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%