2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical approach to infer terrestrial heat flux from shallow temperature profiles in remote northern regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, by imposing a time-varying upper boundary condition, the model is capable to reproduce the variations in the surface temperature caused by the several climate events that have been occurring since late Pleistocene (Table 1; [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106]). These climate disturbances propagate downwards by thermal diffusion, disrupting the steady-state geothermal gradient and affecting not only the present-day heat flux [89] and references therein but the subsurface temperature as well (as supported by this work; Table 7). The amplitude of the climate events exponentially decay with depth and their signal attenuates [55].…”
Section: D Subsurface Temperature Distributionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, by imposing a time-varying upper boundary condition, the model is capable to reproduce the variations in the surface temperature caused by the several climate events that have been occurring since late Pleistocene (Table 1; [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106]). These climate disturbances propagate downwards by thermal diffusion, disrupting the steady-state geothermal gradient and affecting not only the present-day heat flux [89] and references therein but the subsurface temperature as well (as supported by this work; Table 7). The amplitude of the climate events exponentially decay with depth and their signal attenuates [55].…”
Section: D Subsurface Temperature Distributionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In turn, the thermophysical properties evaluated at water saturation conditions led to an increase of the heat flux: 34.1 to 69.4 mW m −2 , with an average value of 49.7 mW m −2 [89]. The heat flux estimates of Miranda et al [89] were used as the lower boundary condition in the present work.…”
Section: Subsurface Temperature Distributionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations